Skip to main content
Glama
FINOS AI Governance MCP Server

FINOS AI Governance MCP Server

Official
by finos

Related Servers

Alternatives to FINOS AI Governance MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI applications to access and contextualize organizational knowledge sources including GitHub repositories and internal documentation through standardized MCP protocol integration. Features OAuth 2.1 authentication, vector-based semantic search, and optimized context chunking for enterprise development workflows.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients such as Claude Desktop, Cline, and Cursor to extract information from GitHub repositories, including repository summaries, project directory structure, and file contents. It exposes these capabilities as tools that can be invoked directly from a natural-language chat session.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Analyzes repositories, explains architecture, calculates change impact, and enforces guardrails for AI Agents like Claude Code, Cursor, and Codex via MCP tools.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to search a security corpus, scan Terraform plan JSON for cited findings, and list sources via MCP tools grounded in CIS AWS Foundations and OWASP Top 10 CI/CD risks.
      3
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The list/get pairs are cleanly separated by resource type (frameworks, risks, mitigations), and search_frameworks is explicitly scoped to frameworks only, so an agent can tell it apart from the getters. The only soft overlap is between get_service_health and get_cache_stats, both diagnostic calls whose boundaries are not fully explained.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Every tool follows the same snake_case verb_noun pattern (list_*, get_*, search_*), with no camelCase or bare-noun outliers. The verb predicts the behavior reliably: list returns catalogs, get returns full document content, search returns matches.

    Tool Count5/5

    Nine tools is well within the ideal range and each earns its place: three resource types times a list/get pair, plus one search and two small operational diagnostics. Nothing appears redundant or padded.

    Completeness4/5

    The read-only document lifecycle is fully covered for all three resources (list + get), plus search for frameworks. The notable gap is that phrase search exists only for frameworks, leaving risks and mitigations requiring an expensive list-then-get flow; there is also no cross-corpus search or framework-vs-requirement comparison capability.

    Maintenance

    ActivityNo data
    ResponsivenessOutdated data