frc-mcp
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to frc-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for HUD housing data, enabling Fair Market Rent lookups, Section 8 income limits, and ZIP-to-county crosswalk mapping for affordable housing assessments.68 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that exposes the credit scoring model's deterministic tools (probability of default, SHAP explanations, typicality check, financial ratios) to AI agents, enabling natural language credit risk assessment.-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that exposes real US flood insurance claims data from FEMA's OpenFEMA API, providing tools for claim lookup, filtered search, aggregate stats, and flood event summaries.4MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for the loc8n Geographic Data API. Exposes U.S. demographics, housing, mortgage, migration, employment, and geographic data as tools.2351 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceRemote MCP server exposing US Census (ACS 5-year) and FEMA flood data. Works as a connector in both Claude and ChatGPT.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceChains FRED, BLS, ATTOM, and HUD APIs to provide housing intelligence data through a single MCP server.3 npm1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 5 tools
Each tool targets a distinct scope: national, lender-specific, state-level, lender listing, and door-effect analysis. There is minor overlap between list_lenders and the lender tables inside get_door_effect_summary, but the descriptions make the intended use clear.
Most tools follow a get_<scope>_stats pattern, which is predictable and readable. list_lenders and get_door_effect_summary deviate slightly from that pattern, but the naming remains consistent in style and verb usage.
Five tools is well-scoped for a specialized FHA denial statistics server. Each tool covers a meaningful slice of the domain without redundancy or bloat.
The tool surface covers national aggregates, state-level views, individual lender stats, lender rankings, and the cross-lender door effect analysis. For the stated purpose of exposing FHA denial statistics, there are no obvious missing operations or dead ends.