Skip to main content
Glama
filhocf

sonarqube-mcp-py

by filhocf

search_files_by_coverage

Identify files with the lowest test coverage in a SonarQube project, helping focus improvement efforts on code areas with insufficient testing.

Instructions

Find files with lowest coverage

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
componentYes
page_sizeNo
branchNo
Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, and description does not disclose behavioral traits such as sorting order, pagination, or whether it returns lowest N files. Cannot assess safety or side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness2/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single short sentence is concise but underspecified. Not a model of conciseness; lacks essential details.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a search tool with 3 parameters and no output schema, the one-sentence description is insufficient. It does not explain return format, parameter roles, or any constraints.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema has 0% description coverage for 3 parameters. Description adds no meaning beyond the schema, leaving component, page_size, and branch unexplained.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose3/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description states 'Find files with lowest coverage', which is a clear verb+resource but lacks specificity on whether it returns all files sorted or only the lowest. It does not distinguish from sibling 'get_file_coverage_details'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'get_file_coverage_details'. No context on prerequisites or use cases.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/filhocf/sonarqube-mcp-py'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server