Skip to main content
Glama
fhyxz1

Builder-Proj-MCP Server

by fhyxz1
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Builder-Proj-MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Arch-Master MCP

      NicolasAEV
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Multi-stack scaffolding engine for generating production-ready module structures (NestJS, Java Spring, Python FastAPI) directly from an MCP-compatible AI client, reducing token usage for boilerplate code.
      -

    • MCP-Server-Starter-Kit

      MosetiReagan
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables developers to scaffold production-ready MCP servers with typed tools, resources, prompts, transports, authentication, and database integrations.
      MIT

    • FastMCP Demo Server

      apoojary94
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A production-ready MCP server that provides hackathon resources and reusable starter prompts. Built with FastMCP framework and includes comprehensive deployment options for development and production environments.
      1
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have completely distinct purposes: build_project creates a project with a specified framework, while list_frameworks simply lists available frameworks. There is no overlap or ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern: build_project and list_frameworks. The naming is clear and predictable.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 2 tools, the server is minimal for its purpose of project scaffolding. While it covers the essential actions (list and build), the tool count feels thin and could benefit from additional tools like delete_project or update_project.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers the core workflow: listing available frameworks and building a project. It misses operations like project deletion or configuration, but for a simple scaffolding server, it is reasonably complete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources