Skip to main content
Glama
fhs1220888

Groundline

by fhs1220888
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Groundline

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • heddle

      goweft
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables users to define and run MCP tools using declarative YAML configs with built-in trust enforcement, credential brokering, and tamper-evident audit logging.
      13
      MIT

    • rosbag

      Six-Bit-TX
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables agents to inspect and analyze ROS recordings through MCP tools and resources, including topic indexing, frame/point-cloud/depth sampling, IMU/odometry series, calibration, and exportable clips, previews, and reports. It provides bounded queries and materialization of analysis artifacts without requiring a ROS installation.
      MIT

    • aether

      n-3-0-l-d-3-v
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables evidence-first binary and firmware analysis through MCP, exposing tools to initialize projects, analyze artifacts, query structured claims, export results, and run evaluations.
      Apache 2.0

    • provmcp

      AbhiAdhikari
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables provenance capture and replay verification for scientific MCP tool calls, using a signed hash-chained ledger and data-source release resolution.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool maps to a distinct step: load a run, discover analyses, execute one, verify findings, and emit a report. The only soft overlap is that write_html_report also performs verification, which could cause an agent to skip the standalone verify tool, but the boundaries remain clear.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a verb_noun or verb_object pattern (open_run, list_analysis_tools, run_analysis, write_html_report). The lone bare verb 'verify' is a minor deviation but still readable and unambiguous.

    Tool Count4/5

    Five tools is well-scoped for a run-analysis pipeline, with each tool earning its place. It is on the lean side but nothing feels redundant.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the core lifecycle: open a run, discover analyses, execute them, verify evidence, and produce a report. Minor gaps exist (no way to list previously opened runs or explicitly close a run), but agents can work around these.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources