Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Groundline

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to coordinate local profilers, benchmark tools, trace processors, and direct targets, turning explicit artifacts or commands into bounded runtime evidence with provenance, coverage, and limitations. Exposes named analysis and capture tools through MCP without workspace setup, with optional durable preservation.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables agents to gather bounded, reproducible runtime evidence by coordinating local profilers, benchmark tools, and trace processors against explicit artifacts or captured commands. It exposes typed analysis and capture operations over MCP that return provenance-tracked results inline, with optional durable preservation and replay of prior evidence.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to coordinate local profilers, benchmark tools, trace processors, and explicit targets into bounded runtime evidence, including observed inputs, execution provenance, typed findings, coverage, and limitations. It supports analysis and capture through named MCP tools without workspace setup or project configuration.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables users to define and run MCP tools using declarative YAML configs with built-in trust enforcement, credential brokering, and tamper-evident audit logging.
      14
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to coordinate profilers, benchmark tools, trace processors, and direct local targets on explicit artifacts or commands, returning bounded typed runtime evidence with provenance, coverage, and limitations. Supports analysis and capture tools over MCP, with optional durable evidence preservation and inline results for failures and recovery.
      -

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool maps to a distinct step: load a run, discover analyses, execute one, verify findings, and emit a report. The only soft overlap is that write_html_report also performs verification, which could cause an agent to skip the standalone verify tool, but the boundaries remain clear.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a verb_noun or verb_object pattern (open_run, list_analysis_tools, run_analysis, write_html_report). The lone bare verb 'verify' is a minor deviation but still readable and unambiguous.

    Tool Count4/5

    Five tools is well-scoped for a run-analysis pipeline, with each tool earning its place. It is on the lean side but nothing feels redundant.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the core lifecycle: open a run, discover analyses, execute them, verify evidence, and produce a report. Minor gaps exist (no way to list previously opened runs or explicitly close a run), but agents can work around these.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues