get-trends

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description must disclose behavioral context. It only says 'Get current trending topics' without noting whether the tool is read-only, whether authentication is required, what the response format looks like, or any rate-limit considerations. This is minimal behavioral disclosure beyond the basic verb.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence that conveys the core purpose without waste. However, it is extremely terse, bordering on under-specification for a tool with two parameters and no annotations.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple query tool, the description plus complete parameter schema provide a basic understanding, but the lack of an output schema and any behavioral notes leaves some gaps. The description does not explain what 'trending topics' includes or how includeSuggested modifies the result.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema fully describes both parameters (limit, includeSuggested) with ranges and defaults, so the description does not need to add parameter details. However, the description also does not add any extra meaning or context about how these parameters affect results.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Get'), the resource ('current trending topics'), and the platform ('Bluesky'). It distinguishes from sibling tools like get-timeline-posts and search-posts by specifying trends specifically.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool or when to prefer an alternative. It does not mention any distinguishing use cases, exclusions, or relationships to sibling tools like search-posts or get-feed-posts.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.