F
licenseA
qualityC
maintenanceMCP server for Google Keep that enables managing notes, checklists, and labels through tools like search, create, update, and delete.
18
-
Keep MCP
by feuerdev
Related Servers
Alternatives to Keep MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables users to create, search, and retrieve Google Keep notes via natural language commands.-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables Claude or Cursor to read Google Keep notes and checklists, add items, and check or uncheck them via MCP over HTTP with OAuth.7MIT
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that connects Google Keep to Claude, enabling full note management capabilities including search, CRUD, checklists, labels, and more.20-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP-compatible clients to create, list, search, and delete notes, read all notes as markdown, and use prompts to summarize or clean up notes.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceExposes Google Keep notes as tools so MCP clients like Claude Code or Claude Desktop can read and manage them, connecting through the unofficial gkeepapi client since Keep has no official public API.2MIT
TDQS
B3/5.0
Scored across 23 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose, covering notes, labels, checklist items, collaboration, and media. There is minimal overlap; for example, archive, trash, delete, and restore are all separate actions. An agent can reliably select the correct tool.
Naming Consistency4/5
Most tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with snake_case (e.g., add_label_to_note, create_note). Minor inconsistency: 'find' is a bare verb instead of 'find_notes', and 'create_list' creates a checklist note rather than using 'create_checklist'. Overall, the pattern is predictable.
Tool Count4/5
23 tools is slightly above the typical 3-15 range but reasonable for a full-featured note-taking server. Each tool captures a specific operation, and the count is not overwhelming for the domain.
Completeness3/5
CRUD operations are covered for notes, labels, and checklist items. However, there is no tool to list all notes (only find with text search), and no explicit tool to unarchive or unpin (toggle behavior), which could cause agent failures if not inferred. Notable gaps exist.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessUnresponsive