de en es zh

mcp-mssqlserver

Name: mcp-mssqlserver
Author: ferronicardoso

by ferronicardoso

Overview Schema Source Related Servers Discussions Admin

JavaScript

Remote

Servidor MCP para Microsoft SQL Server

Docker Publish GHCR Node.js

Servidor MCP orientado a producción para Microsoft SQL Server, que expone operaciones de base de datos a clientes MCP (Claude Desktop, VS Code Copilot, Cursor y hosts compatibles).

Características

Ejecución de consultas (SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE)
Descubrimiento de bases de datos e introspección de esquemas
Inspección de metadatos de tablas (columnas, tipos, nulabilidad, valores predeterminados, clave primaria)
Descubrimiento de índices y claves foráneas
Configuración basada en variables de entorno para un despliegue seguro

Related MCP server: SQL Query Tools MCP Server

Herramientas disponibles

Herramienta	Descripción
`execute_query`	Ejecuta una sentencia SQL y devuelve conjuntos de registros o filas afectadas
`list_tables`	Lista tablas desde `INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLES` (filtro de esquema opcional)
`describe_table`	Devuelve metadatos de columnas de tabla y marcadores de clave primaria
`list_databases`	Lista todas las bases de datos de SQL Server
`get_table_indexes`	Lista índices de tabla, tipo, unicidad, clave primaria y columnas indexadas
`get_foreign_keys`	Lista claves foráneas de tabla y destinos referenciados

Requisitos

Node.js 18+
Acceso a una instancia de Microsoft SQL Server
Conectividad de red desde el host MCP a SQL Server (host:puerto)

Configuración

Establezca los ajustes de conexión mediante variables de entorno:

Variable	Obligatoria	Predeterminado	Descripción
`MSSQL_HOST`	No	`localhost`	Host o IP de SQL Server
`MSSQL_PORT`	No	`1433`	Puerto TCP de SQL Server
`MSSQL_DATABASE`	Sí	—	Base de datos predeterminada
`MSSQL_AUTH_MODE`	No	`sql`	Modo de autenticación: `sql` o `windows`
`MSSQL_USER`	Sí*	—	Usuario de inicio de sesión SQL (solo requerido en `sql`)
`MSSQL_PASSWORD`	Sí*	—	Contraseña de inicio de sesión SQL (solo requerida en `sql`)
`MSSQL_ENCRYPT`	No	`false`	Habilita la conexión cifrada
`MSSQL_TRUST_SERVER_CERTIFICATE`	No	`true`	Confía en el certificado del servidor cuando el cifrado está habilitado

* Obligatorio cuando MSSQL_AUTH_MODE=sql.

| MCP_TRANSPORT | No | stdio | Modo de transporte: stdio (predeterminado, para npx/Claude Desktop/VS Code) o http (HTTP Streamable, para Docker/clientes remotos como n8n) | | MCP_HTTP_PORT | No | 3001 | Puerto para el servidor HTTP (solo se usa cuando MCP_TRANSPORT=http) | | MCP_HTTP_HOST | No | 0.0.0.0 | Dirección de enlace para el servidor HTTP (solo se usa cuando MCP_TRANSPORT=http) |

Nota: la imagen Docker publicada siempre se ejecuta en modo http y no compila el controlador nativo msnodesqlv8 (usado solo para MSSQL_AUTH_MODE=windows). La autenticación de Windows solo está disponible cuando se ejecuta el servidor directamente en un host Windows mediante npx/npm start.

Uso

Ejecutar directamente desde GitHub

npx github:ferronicardoso/mcp-mssqlserver

Claude Code (CLI)

claude mcp add mssqlserver --scope user -- npx -y github:ferronicardoso/mcp-mssqlserver

--scope controla dónde se almacena el registro del servidor:

Ámbito	Almacenado en	Visible para
`local` (predeterminado)	local al proyecto, sin seguimiento	solo para ti, solo en este proyecto
`project`	`.mcp.json` en la raíz del proyecto	cualquiera que clone el repositorio (haz commit para compartirlo)
`user`	tu configuración global de Claude Code	para ti, en todos los proyectos

Las variables de entorno se pueden pasar con banderas repetidas --env CLAVE=VALOR antes del --, por ejemplo:

Bash (Linux/macOS/WSL):

claude mcp add mssqlserver --scope user \
  --env MSSQL_HOST=localhost \
  --env MSSQL_PORT=1433 \
  --env MSSQL_DATABASE=master \
  --env MSSQL_AUTH_MODE=sql \
  --env MSSQL_USER=sa \
  --env MSSQL_PASSWORD=your-password \
  -- npx -y github:ferronicardoso/mcp-mssqlserver

PowerShell:

claude mcp add mssqlserver --scope user `
  --env MSSQL_HOST=localhost `
  --env MSSQL_PORT=1433 `
  --env MSSQL_DATABASE=master `
  --env MSSQL_AUTH_MODE=sql `
  --env MSSQL_USER=sa `
  --env MSSQL_PASSWORD=your-password `
  -- npx -y github:ferronicardoso/mcp-mssqlserver

Codex CLI

Bash (Linux/macOS/WSL):

codex mcp add mssqlserver \
  --env MSSQL_AUTH_MODE=sql \
  --env MSSQL_HOST=localhost \
  --env MSSQL_PORT=1433 \
  --env MSSQL_DATABASE=master \
  --env MSSQL_USER=sa \
  --env MSSQL_PASSWORD=your-password \
  npx -- -y github:ferronicardoso/mcp-mssqlserver

PowerShell:

codex mcp add mssqlserver `
  --env MSSQL_AUTH_MODE=sql `
  --env MSSQL_HOST=localhost `
  --env MSSQL_PORT=1433 `
  --env MSSQL_DATABASE=master `
  --env MSSQL_USER=sa `
  --env MSSQL_PASSWORD=your-password `
  npx -- -y github:ferronicardoso/mcp-mssqlserver

Para usar autenticación de Windows en su lugar, omita MSSQL_USER/MSSQL_PASSWORD y establezca MSSQL_AUTH_MODE=windows:

Bash (Linux/macOS/WSL):

codex mcp add mssqlserver \
  --env MSSQL_AUTH_MODE=windows \
  --env MSSQL_HOST=localhost \
  --env MSSQL_PORT=1433 \
  --env MSSQL_DATABASE=master \
  npx -- -y github:ferronicardoso/mcp-mssqlserver

PowerShell:

codex mcp add mssqlserver `
  --env MSSQL_AUTH_MODE=windows `
  --env MSSQL_HOST=localhost `
  --env MSSQL_PORT=1433 `
  --env MSSQL_DATABASE=master `
  npx -- -y github:ferronicardoso/mcp-mssqlserver

Esto registra el servidor en ~/.codex/config.toml. Para eliminarlo, ejecute codex mcp remove mssqlserver.

Configuración de Claude Desktop

%APPDATA%\\Claude\\claude_desktop_config.json:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mssqlserver": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["github:ferronicardoso/mcp-mssqlserver"],
      "env": {
        "MSSQL_HOST": "localhost",
        "MSSQL_PORT": "1433",
        "MSSQL_DATABASE": "master",
        "MSSQL_AUTH_MODE": "sql",
        "MSSQL_USER": "sa",
        "MSSQL_PASSWORD": "your-password"
      }
    }
  }
}

Configuración de MCP en VS Code

.vscode/mcp.json:

{
  "servers": {
    "mssqlserver": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["github:ferronicardoso/mcp-mssqlserver"],
      "env": {
        "MSSQL_HOST": "localhost",
        "MSSQL_PORT": "1433",
        "MSSQL_DATABASE": "master",
        "MSSQL_AUTH_MODE": "sql",
        "MSSQL_USER": "sa",
        "MSSQL_PASSWORD": "your-password"
      }
    }
  }
}

Ejecutar con Docker (transporte HTTP)

La imagen publicada se ejecuta en modo HTTP Streamable de forma predeterminada, para usarse como endpoint MCP remoto (por ejemplo, desde el nodo MCP Client Tool de n8n o cualquier cliente compatible con HTTP Streamable):

Bash (Linux/macOS/WSL):

docker run -d --name mcp-mssqlserver \
  -p 3001:3001 \
  -e MSSQL_HOST=host.docker.internal \
  -e MSSQL_PORT=1433 \
  -e MSSQL_DATABASE=master \
  -e MSSQL_AUTH_MODE=sql \
  -e MSSQL_USER=sa \
  -e MSSQL_PASSWORD=your-password \
  ghcr.io/ferronicardoso/mcp-mssqlserver:latest

PowerShell:

docker run -d --name mcp-mssqlserver `
  -p 3001:3001 `
  -e MSSQL_HOST=host.docker.internal `
  -e MSSQL_PORT=1433 `
  -e MSSQL_DATABASE=master `
  -e MSSQL_AUTH_MODE=sql `
  -e MSSQL_USER=sa `
  -e MSSQL_PASSWORD=your-password `
  ghcr.io/ferronicardoso/mcp-mssqlserver:latest

El endpoint MCP estará disponible en http://localhost:3001/mcp.

Desarrollo local

git clone https://github.com/ferronicardoso/mcp-mssqlserver
cd mcp-mssqlserver
npm install
npm run build

Inicie el servidor compilado:

npm start

Flujo de compilación y confirmación

Este repositorio rastrea intencionalmente dist/ para admitir el uso de npx github:usuario/repo.

El proyecto utiliza un hook de Husky pre-commit para:

compilar TypeScript (npm run build)
preparar los artefactos generados (git add dist)

Alternativa manual:

npm run build
git add dist

Notas de seguridad

Nunca confirme credenciales reales ni archivos .env.
Prefiera usuarios SQL con privilegios mínimos para uso en producción.
Para redes públicas o no confiables, habilite el cifrado (MSSQL_ENCRYPT=true) y configure los certificados adecuadamente.

Autenticación de Windows (Seguridad integrada)

Para usar autenticación de Windows con seguridad integrada (cuenta de proceso), configure:

MSSQL_AUTH_MODE=windows
MSSQL_HOST=sqlserver.company.local
MSSQL_PORT=1433
MSSQL_DATABASE=master

Licencia

MIT © Raphael Augusto Ferroni Cardoso

Available Tools

6 tools

describe_tableB

Retorna a estrutura de uma tabela: colunas, tipos de dados, nulabilidade e valores padrão.

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`table`	Yes	Nome da tabela
`schema`	No	Schema da tabela (padrão: dbo)

TDQS

B3.4/5.0

Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, and the description does not disclose any behavioral traits (e.g., read-only nature, auth requirements, performance impact). The read-only nature is only implied by the tool name.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence that concisely and clearly conveys the tool's purpose with no wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, the description adequately explains the return contents. Could mention error handling or ordering but sufficient for a simple describe tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. Description does not add extra meaning beyond the schema's parameter descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool returns table structure (columns, types, nullability, defaults) but does not explicitly distinguish from sibling tools like list_tables or get_foreign_keys.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives; usage is implied from the name and description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

execute_queryA

Executa uma query SQL no SQL Server e retorna os resultados. Use para SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE e DELETE.

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`query`	Yes	A query SQL a ser executada

TDQS

A3.7/5.0

Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It mentions that the tool can execute INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE, implying data modification, but lacks details on side effects, authentication needs, rate limits, transaction behavior, or error handling. The description does not go beyond the obvious.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that front-loads the purpose and lists supported SQL commands. It is concise and contains no unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has one simple parameter and no output schema. The description mentions it returns results but not in what format (e.g., rows, affected rows). For a query execution tool, more details on return structure, error behavior, and supported SQL dialect would improve completeness, but it covers the essential purpose.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% (the schema describes the query parameter). The description adds that the query can be SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE, or DELETE, which is useful context but does not significantly deepen parameter understanding beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it executes a SQL query on SQL Server and specifies it is for SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE. It differentiates itself from sibling tools that focus on metadata (describing tables, listing databases) by explicitly mentioning execution of DML and DQL statements.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description indicates when to use the tool (for SQL queries of types SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE). It provides clear context, though it does not explicitly exclude scenarios or mention alternatives. However, the sibling tools are distinctly different, so implicit differentiation exists.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

get_foreign_keysC

Lista as chaves estrangeiras de uma tabela e suas referências.

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`table`	Yes	Nome da tabela
`schema`	No	Schema da tabela (padrão: dbo)

TDQS

C2.9/5.0

Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, and the description does not disclose any behavioral traits beyond the action. It does not mention that it is a read-only operation, required permissions, or any side effects. The description is minimal.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with no unnecessary words. It is concise and front-loads the core purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool lacks an output schema, yet the description does not explain the format of the returned data. It only says 'lists foreign keys and their references' without detailing what fields or structure to expect. Given the complexity of foreign key definitions, more information is needed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents both parameters. The description does not add any additional meaning beyond what is in the schema. Baseline is 3, and there is no extra value.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool lists foreign keys and their references for a given table. The verb 'Lista' and resource are specific. However, it does not differentiate from sibling tools like describe_table, which may also show foreign keys, but the purpose is still distinct enough.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as describe_table or get_table_indexes. The description only states what it does without any context about prerequisites or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

get_table_indexesB

Lista os índices de uma tabela, incluindo colunas e tipo de índice.

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`table`	Yes	Nome da tabela
`schema`	No	Schema da tabela (padrão: dbo)

TDQS

B3.2/5.0

Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations present. The description only states what is listed (indexes, columns, type) but omits behavioral details like whether indexes are returned in a specific order, whether the operation is read-only (obvious but not stated), or any side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence conveying the core functionality without extraneous words. Perfectly concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simple nature of the tool (listing indexes with columns and type) and full schema coverage, the description is largely complete. However, it could mention the output shape or that it covers all indexes in the table.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with clear descriptions for both parameters (table name, schema). The tool description adds no additional parameter detail beyond what the schema provides, so baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly specifies the tool lists table indexes including columns and type. It is a specific verb and resource, but does not explicitly differentiate from siblings like describe_table.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like describe_table or get_foreign_keys. The usage context is implied but not explained.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

list_databasesA

Lista todos os bancos de dados disponíveis no servidor SQL Server.

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
No parameters

TDQS

A3.7/5.0

Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description only states the basic function. It does not disclose any behavioral traits such as read-only nature, required permissions, or whether operations are safe.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence with no wasted words. It is front-loaded and efficiently communicates the purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple list tool with no parameters or annotations, the description is minimally viable but lacks details about output format or ordering. Could be more complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, and the description does not add parameter details because none exist. The baseline for zero parameters is 4, and the description is adequate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'List' and the resource 'all available databases on the SQL Server server', making it distinct from sibling tools like list_tables which list tables.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies the tool is for listing databases but does not provide explicit guidance on when to use it versus alternatives, nor does it mention prerequisites or context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

list_tablesA

Lista todas as tabelas do banco de dados atual, opcionalmente filtrando por schema.

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`schema`	No	Schema a filtrar (padrão: todos os schemas)

TDQS

A4/5.0

Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It reveals that the tool is a read operation (listing) with optional filtering, but does not disclose return format, permissions, or potential side effects. Lack of output schema leaves ambiguity about the result structure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence containing no unnecessary words. It is well-suited for quick comprehension.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple listing tool, the description covers the core purpose and optional filtering. However, the lack of output schema means the agent must infer the return format, which is a minor completeness gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents the 'schema' parameter. The description merely reiterates the filtering option without adding new semantic meaning.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool lists all tables of the current database with optional schema filtering, which distinguishes it from siblings like describe_table (single table details) and execute_query (arbitrary SQL).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for listing tables with optional filtering, but does not explicitly contrast with siblings or state when not to use it. The context of sibling tools provides some implicit guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

6 tool updatesv1.0.0Jun 30, 2026
- First observeddescribe_table
- First observedexecute_query
- First observedget_foreign_keys
- First observedget_table_indexes
- First observedlist_databases
- First observedlist_tables

Deploy Server

Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

TDQS

A3.7/5.0

Scored 2026-06-30 22:45 across 6 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: describing table structure, executing arbitrary queries, listing foreign keys, indexes, databases, and tables. No overlap or ambiguity.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using snake_case (e.g., describe_table, get_foreign_keys, list_databases), making them predictable and easy to understand.

Tool Count5/5

With 6 tools, the set is well-scoped for a SQL Server utility server, covering essential introspection and query execution without being overly numerous or sparse.

Completeness4/5

The tools cover core database introspection (list databases, tables, describe table, get indexes/foreign keys) and query execution. Missing advanced features like schema management or stored procedure execution, but these are minor gaps for typical usage.

Maintenance

ActivitySlowing

ResponsivenessNo issues

Resources

GitHub Repository

Need Help?

Related Servers

Related MCP Connectors

mcpOAuth
io.prisma
MCP server for managing Prisma Postgres.
Databases Developer Tools
249
AI2SQLOAuth
io.ai2sql
Text-to-SQL MCP server: read-only queries on PostgreSQL, MySQL and SQL Server with your real schema
Databases Developer Tools
1
MANDATE Credential Broker B
io.github.projetnanocorp
MCP server for mandates, delegation, policy-gated execution, credential grants, and audit.
Security
111
SupabaseOAuth
com.supabase
MCP server for interacting with the Supabase platform
Cloud Platforms Databases Developer Tools
32,943

Related MCP Servers

mcp-server-mssql
Databases Developer Tools
daedalus
A
license
Not graded
quality
C
maintenance
Provides tools to connect, query, and manage Microsoft SQL Server databases through the MCP protocol, including support for stored procedures, transactions, and schema inspection.
Updated 6 months ago (2026-04-21 19:28 UTC)
30 PyPI
MIT
SQL Query Tools MCP Server
Databases Security
negrip
F
license
A
quality
D
maintenance
MCP server for connecting to SQL Server in readonly mode. Allows any MCP client to explore the schema and run SELECT queries against a SQL Server database.
Updated 6 months ago (2026-04-01 20:52 UTC)
6
-
mssql-mcp-server
Databases Developer Tools
thochi
A
license
Not graded
quality
D
maintenance
MCP server for executing SQL queries and managing connections to Microsoft SQL Server databases.
Updated 2 years ago (2025-02-15 13:10 UTC)
3,569 npm
1
MIT
SJSINGLE_AI SQL Server MCP
Databases AI & Machine Learning
DhruviPatel712
A
license
Not graded
quality
D
maintenance
MCP server for Microsoft SQL Server enabling safe read-only queries, schema discovery, and natural-language query via LangChain.
Updated 4 months ago (2026-06-27 10:03 UTC)
MIT