Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCPilot

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCPGate aggregates multiple MCP servers into a single unified endpoint, enabling centralized tool management with granular filtering, automatic namespacing, and observability. Features a real-time web dashboard and optional PostgreSQL-backed audit trails for monitoring and controlling AI tool access across local and remote deployments.
      5 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      D
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A meta API Gateway server that works with the Model Context Protocol (MCP), enabling AI assistants to connect to any API and access real-world data sources through standardized MCP tools.
      70
      51 npm
      12
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Unified local MCP AI Gateway that routes across Groq, OpenRouter, Mistral, and local Ollama providers, with OpenAI-compatible APIs, MCP tools, fallback/racing router, monitoring, and web dashboard.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      A universal gateway that aggregates multiple MCP servers into a single interface while providing advanced token optimization, result filtering, and automated summarization. It enables efficient management of large tool catalogs and reduces context usage by up to 95% for major AI clients.
      9 npm
      16
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A unified gateway and web dashboard that aggregates multiple MCP servers into a single Streamable HTTP endpoint. It supports stdio, SSE, and HTTP protocols, featuring optimized tool exposure modes to reduce token consumption for AI clients.
      5
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.6/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion or overlap with other tools. The tool's purpose is clearly defined as adding a new note, making it distinct by default.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    A single tool inherently follows a consistent naming pattern, as there are no other tools to compare it against. The name 'add-note' uses a verb-noun format with hyphenation, which is clear and readable.

    Tool Count2/5

    A single tool is generally too few for most server purposes, as it limits functionality and suggests an incomplete or trivial scope. For a note-taking domain, one tool is insufficient to cover basic operations like listing, updating, or deleting notes.

    Completeness1/5

    The server appears to be for note-taking, but with only an 'add-note' tool, it lacks essential operations such as retrieving, updating, deleting, or listing notes. This severe gap will cause agent failures in handling note-related workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues