Compare Bootstrap Class Between Versions

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Description adds behavioral context beyond annotations: specifies it handles common renames between Bootstrap 4 and 5 and returns a migration suggestion if the class changed. Annotations (readOnlyHint, idempotentHint) align, and no contradictions exist.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is concise: one sentence for purpose, one for examples, and a structured Args/Returns section. No wasted words, front-loaded with key information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given single parameter, detailed annotations, and no output schema, the description adequately covers what the tool does, what input is needed, and what output to expect (migration suggestion). Complete for its complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Only one parameter (class_name), schema coverage 100%, and description adds minimal value beyond schema's description. The schema already documents the parameter well; the description repeats it with a hint about usage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Title and description clearly state the tool checks migration status of Bootstrap CSS classes between v4 and v5. The verb 'Check' with specific resource ('Bootstrap CSS class migration') distinguishes it from siblings like bs_lookup_class or generation tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Description lists common renames (mr- -> me- etc.) providing context for when the tool is useful. However, it does not explicitly state when to use vs alternatives (e.g., not for obtaining current class definition) or when not to use, which would improve guideline clarity.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.