Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-speak

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables AI agents to narrate internal thoughts, announce tool actions, and speak final responses aloud through local cross-platform text-to-speech. It exposes dedicated audio tools over stdio JSON-RPC for MCP-compatible clients.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Enables AI agents to give spoken output by synthesizing text into speech with an on-device neural model and playing it through the user's speakers, entirely offline. Agents can queue spoken summaries and stop playback on demand.
    2 npm
    MIT
  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Enables coding agents to speak aloud using text-to-speech functionality. Works with agents running inside devcontainers and provides configurable voice settings for creating chatty AI companions.
    6
    -
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables MCP clients to speak text aloud on macOS using the built-in say command, with no external speech API or keys, and to list available voices and control rate or voice selection. Requests from multiple client threads share a single FIFO playback worker, so speech plays one item at a time and can be inspected, stopped, or muted in hold or discard mode.
    3 npm
    MIT

TDQS

A4.2/5.0

Scored across 2 tools

Disambiguation4/5

The two tools perform the same core action but are clearly differentiated by blocking behavior, with descriptive names and explicit notes in the descriptions. There is some overlap in purpose, but the distinction is obvious enough for an agent to select correctly.

Naming Consistency5/5

Both tool names follow a consistent verb-first pattern with a modifier suffix (speak, speak_non_blocking). Naming clearly conveys the difference without mixing conventions or vague verbs.

Tool Count5/5

Two tools is well-scoped for a text-to-speech server with blocking and non-blocking variants. Every tool earns its place, and the count matches the narrow purpose.

Completeness4/5

The server provides both blocking and non-blocking speech synthesis, covering the primary use cases. Minor gaps like canceling playback or selecting voices exist, but they are optional for the core domain.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues