Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-speak

Related Servers

TDQS

A4.2/5.0

Scored across 2 tools

Disambiguation4/5

The two tools perform the same core action but are clearly differentiated by blocking behavior, with descriptive names and explicit notes in the descriptions. There is some overlap in purpose, but the distinction is obvious enough for an agent to select correctly.

Naming Consistency5/5

Both tool names follow a consistent verb-first pattern with a modifier suffix (speak, speak_non_blocking). Naming clearly conveys the difference without mixing conventions or vague verbs.

Tool Count5/5

Two tools is well-scoped for a text-to-speech server with blocking and non-blocking variants. Every tool earns its place, and the count matches the narrow purpose.

Completeness4/5

The server provides both blocking and non-blocking speech synthesis, covering the primary use cases. Minor gaps like canceling playback or selecting voices exist, but they are optional for the core domain.

Maintenance

ActivityActive
ResponsivenessNo issues