Skip to main content
Glama
felix-e

maester-mcp

by felix-e

Related Servers

Alternatives to maester-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A governed MCP server with OAuth 2.1 + PKCE, declarative tool scoping, row-level data filters, per-identity rate limits, and a tamper-evident audit trail.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Multi-tenant MCP server with OAuth 2.1 authorization, enabling tenant-scoped tool access and audit logging.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enforces authorization by evaluating Rego policies or querying an OpenID AuthZEN-compliant PDP, providing accurate access decisions for AI agents. It includes tools for policy evaluation, AuthZEN evaluation, batch evaluation, and PDP discovery.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A secure MCP server enabling tool calls (kb_search, read_doc, publish_report) through a zero-trust CapabilityBroker with OWASP LLM Top-10 guardrails and human-in-the-loop approval.
      3
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct aspect of the Maester run data: identity, run listing, run summaries, failed tests, test history, run comparison, and raw detail. No overlap in purpose or ambiguity in selecting the appropriate tool.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools use snake_case with a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., list_runs, get_run_summary, compare_runs), with whoami as a minor but acceptable deviation. The naming is predictable and easy to infer.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 7 tools, the server is well-scoped for a read-only analysis tool covering identity, runs, summaries, failures, history, comparison, and details. Each tool earns its place without excess.

    Completeness3/5

    The server lacks a tool to enumerate all tests or retrieve complete test results beyond failures, leaving a significant gap in understanding overall test outcomes. Compare_runs provides summary changes but not per-test detail, so agents cannot fully assess test coverage.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues