resolve_product

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose side effects and behavior. It implies a read-only summarizing operation via 'resume', but does not clarify what 'resolve' means (e.g., file resolution, software initialization), whether it mutates state, or any prerequisites. This leaves significant behavioral ambiguity.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, concise and front-loaded with the main action. It does not waste words, though the terseness contributes to ambiguity. It earns a high score for efficiency, not clarity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is simple with one optional parameter and an output schema, which reduces the need to document return values. However, the description lacks usage context and fails to explain the relationship to sibling tools. It covers the basic function but leaves gaps for an agent to confidently invoke it.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, so the description must explain the parameter 'product_root'. It only hints at 'produto' (product) but does not explicitly describe the parameter, its format, or role. This does not compensate for the missing schema description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb 'resolve' (though ambiguous) and 'resume' (summarize), indicating the tool aggregates name, projects, presets, and tasks. This distinguishes it from the sibling list/create tools, though the meaning of 'resolve' is unclear without context.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given on when to use this tool versus alternatives like list_projects or list_tasks. It only states what it does, leaving the agent to infer its use case without explicit context or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.