Related Servers

Most tools are clearly distinct by domain (analytics, reporting, playlists, comments, video CRUD), with informative descriptions. The only mild confusion is between youtube_list_videos vs youtube_get_video (list vs detail is standard) and the multiple analytics_* tools are well-differentiated by their specific focus (traffic, geography, demographics, etc.). No two tools appear to do the same thing.

The server consistently uses a youtube_ prefix followed by a clear verb_noun pattern (list_videos, get_video, create_playlist, upload_video, delete_video). Minor deviations: youtube_search_suggestions vs youtube_get_categories, and the reporting tools use a subnamespace (youtube_reporting_list_*) which is structured and predictable. Youtube_analytics_* tools follow a consistent subpattern, though the flat prefix gets long.

At 40 tools, this is on the heavy side and exceeds the typical well-scoped range (3-15). However, YouTube's API surface is genuinely broad, spanning auth, search, channel/video/playlist CRUD, comments, captions, analytics (10+ dedicated tools), reporting, and uploads. The size is defensible for the scope, though it sits above the comfortable threshold.

The tool surface is remarkably comprehensive. It covers video lifecycle (upload, get, list, update, delete, thumbnail), playlist lifecycle, comments (list, post, reply), search, captions/transcripts, trending, channel info, full analytics coverage (overview, top videos, top shorts, demographics, geography, traffic, retention, revenue, day-of-week, content-type), and a complete reporting subsystem. The only minor gap is the absence of playlist update/delete tools, but playlist create/list/add/remove is largely covered.