Skip to main content
Glama
feli0x

DocFS

by feli0x

Related Servers

Alternatives to DocFS

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides a flexible lens into directory structures and files, enabling LLM clients to efficiently navigate and understand codebases with minimal noise. It offers secure, gitignore-aware file access with tools like directory listing, file reading, and grep-like search.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A local filesystem MCP server providing constrained file operations (read/write, directory management, search, metadata) within configurable directories, with read-only mode and zero runtime dependencies.
      3 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A read-only MCP server for code reading with intelligent caching, line-range selection, and language detection, enabling AI assistants to efficiently and safely explore file systems.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A professional MCP server that provides filesystem operations while automatically respecting .gitignore patterns, enabling efficient and token-friendly file access for Claude.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    list_files and dir_tree both provide directory listings, which could cause confusion, but dir_tree is specifically a nested tree while list_files is a flat listing of files and directories. read_files and search_files are clearly distinct: one retrieves content, the other finds text within files.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Three tools follow the consistent verb_noun pattern: list_files, search_files, read_files. dir_tree breaks this pattern by using a noun phrase instead of a verb_noun structure, though it is still readable and follows underscore conventions.

    Tool Count5/5

    Four tools form a well-scoped set for a read-only document/file access server. Each tool addresses a distinct core operation: listing, searching, reading, and showing structure, without unnecessary bloat.

    Completeness4/5

    The read-side workflows are well covered: discovering files, viewing directory structure, searching content, and reading file contents. Missing write/update/delete operations are likely out of scope for a read-only document server, but if the intent is a full file system, these would be notable gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues