Skip to main content
Glama
fedora-copr

Log Detective MCP

Official
by fedora-copr

Related Servers

Alternatives to Log Detective MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to analyze, cluster, compare, and export reports from local log files through seven read-only tools, returning compact evidence packs with line-number citations instead of raw log dumps. All processing happens on the local machine, so log data never leaves the environment.
      854 PyPI
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to analyze logs by extracting patterns, redacting secrets, and providing token-efficient summaries from files, Docker containers, or journald.
      5
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Compresses log files into templates and statistics using Drain3, and exposes them to AI assistants via an MCP server for efficient log monitoring and anomaly detection.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that wraps Drain3 for streaming log template mining, read-only matching, parameter extraction, and model persistence, exposing tools and resources to train on logs and query learned templates.
      8
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one extracts representative log snippets via clustering, while the other extracts Python tracebacks. Shared input parameters do not create ambiguity because their outputs and targeting heuristics are different.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow the same predictable verb_noun snake_case pattern: extract_log_snippets and extract_python_tracebacks. There is no mixing of conventions or vague verbs.

    Tool Count3/5

    Two tools is on the thin side for a server called Log Detective MCP, even though each tool is focused. It is borderline rather than clearly well-scoped for broader log analysis.

    Completeness3/5

    The surface covers two specific extraction modes but lacks general log search, filtering, aggregation, or traceback support for other languages. These are notable gaps for a log-detection toolset, though the provided tools can handle some initial investigation.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues