cicd-aiops
CICD AIops
Governed AI-ops for self-managed GitLab and self-hosted Gitea.
cicd-aiops is for the team running its own CI/CD forge — a GitLab instance
or a Gitea server on your hardware, in your lab, behind your VPN — who want an
AI agent that can answer "why did the pipeline fail?", "which runner is
wedged?", "where did 40 GB of artifact storage go?" and "what work went
stale?" and then act (retry, cancel, pause, delete, protect) only through
an audited, budgeted, risk-tiered, undo-recorded governance harness. It is not
a SaaS integration: it speaks the GitLab REST API v4 and the Gitea API v1
directly against your server, with credentials encrypted at rest.
Verification status: modelled from each project's public API docs and exercised against mocked HTTP responses; there is no recorded end-to-end run against a live server yet.
cicd-aiops doctoris the fastest live check — seedocs/VERIFICATION.md.
Routing: Do NOT use this for Kubernetes deploy state — use k8s-aiops. This tool ends at the CI/CD server's API (pipelines, runners, artifacts, repo hygiene).
What this tool does, and does not, decide
It delivers CI/CD operations — reads and writes — accurately and efficiently, and records every one of them. It does not decide whether a write is allowed to happen. That is the agent's judgement, or the permission of the token you connect it with: give it a GitLab/Gitea access token without write scope and the writes fail at the server — the place that actually owns the permission.
So there is no read-only switch, no policy file, no approval gate to configure.
The one thing the tool guarantees is that nothing is silent: every call, over
MCP and over the CLI alike, lands an audit row in ~/.cicd-aiops/audit.db,
and destructive writes still capture their before-state and record an inverse
where one exists.
Each tool declares a
risk_level, kept in agreement with its[READ]/[WRITE]documentation tag by a test, and carried into the audit row as a descriptive tier — so a reviewer can see at a glance that a row was a high-risk delete. It is a label, not a gate.
Running a smaller / local model? See agent-guardrails.md — it lists the guardrails this tool enforces for you (so you don't spend prompt budget restating them) and gives a ready-made system prompt for what's left.
Related MCP server: observability-aiops
Quick start
uv tool install cicd-aiops # or: pip install cicd-aiops
cicd-aiops init # wizard: base URL + token (encrypted) + TLS verify
cicd-aiops doctor # connectivity + token-scope probe per target
cicd-aiops overview # version, identity, projects, runners at a glanceThen the interesting parts:
cicd-aiops rca pipelines dev/api # classify recent failed pipelines
cicd-aiops rca runners # offline/stale runners, tag saturation
cicd-aiops rca storage # artifact/repo bloat, reclaimable bytes
cicd-aiops rca stale dev/api # stale MRs/branches, protection gaps
cicd-aiops pipelines retry dev/api 42 --dry-run
cicd-aiops artifacts delete dev/api --older-than-days 30 --dry-runEvery write has --dry-run and a double confirmation, and executes through
the same governed path the MCP tools use — so CLI writes are audited too.
Support scope
Surface | GitLab (REST v4, self-managed) | Gitea (API v1, self-hosted) |
Server version + token identity | ✅ | ✅ |
Projects + storage statistics | ✅ ( | ✅ (repo |
Pipelines / runs, jobs, trace tails | ✅ | ✅ (Actions runs/jobs/logs) |
Runner fleet (list/detail) | ✅ | ❌ teaching error (no API v1 equivalent) |
Merge/pull requests, branches, protection, releases | ✅ | ✅ |
Artifact inventory | ✅ (via jobs) | ✅ (Actions artifacts) |
| ✅ | ❌ teaching error |
| ✅ | ❌ teaching error |
| ✅ | ❌ teaching error |
| ✅ | ✅ |
Where a platform lacks a surface, the platform registry raises a teaching error naming the resources that are available — the agent learns instead of hitting a mystery 404. GitLab.com / Gitea Cloud SaaS accounts are out of scope by design: this tool targets self-managed instances.
Flagship analyses (the reason this tool exists)
pipeline_failure_rca— pulls recent failed pipelines with failed-job trace tails and classifies each failure: test-failure / dependency-network / runner-timeout / oom / script-error, with the matched evidence, a cause, and an action per pipeline.runner_health_rca— offline/stale/paused runners (contact-age threshold), jobs queued past a threshold, and per-tag saturation (queued jobs vs online runners).artifact_storage_bloat_analysis— projects ranked by repo + artifact bytes, expired-but-kept artifacts, and a reclaimable-bytes estimate that feeds straight intodelete_artifacts --dry-run.stale_work_audit— merge/pull requests idle past N days, branches with no commits for N days, and protection gaps (unprotected default branch, force-push allowed).
All four are transparent heuristics: thresholds are named parameters and every flag carries its numbers.
Governance (built in, always on)
Every MCP tool and every CLI write runs through the vendored harness in
cicd_aiops/governance/. It records; it does not authorize (see above).
Audit — every call (params, result, status, duration, risk tier, and any operator-supplied approver/rationale) is logged to
~/.cicd-aiops/audit.db(relocatable viaCICD_AIOPS_HOME). The CLI writes the same row the MCP path does — there is no unaudited entry point.Runaway guard — a safety backstop, not an authorization gate: the same call hammered in a tight loop trips a circuit breaker so a stuck agent can't burn unbounded calls/time. Disable with
CICD_RUNAWAY_MAX=0; optional hard ceilings viaCICD_MAX_TOOL_CALLS/CICD_MAX_TOOL_SECONDS.Undo — reversible writes record a replayable inverse in
~/.cicd-aiops/undo.db, built from the fetched before-state:pause_runner⇄resume_runner, andupdate_branch_protectionreplays the prior settings. Irreversible writes (retry_pipeline,cancel_pipeline,delete_artifacts) recordpriorState(status / bytes+count) instead.Risk tier — a descriptive label on the audit row derived from
risk_level(readslow; mutating writesmedium;delete_artifactshigh); it gates nothing.Dry-run everywhere — every write takes
dry_run=True(MCP) /--dry-run(CLI) and previews without calling the server.Sanitize — all server-returned text is folded through an injection-safe normaliser (bounded strings, capped depth) before an agent sees it; all path parameters are percent-encoded so an identifier can never rewrite a URL.
Secrets
Tokens live in ~/.cicd-aiops/secrets.enc — Fernet-encrypted, key derived
from a master password via scrypt. Never plaintext on disk. Set
CICD_AIOPS_MASTER_PASSWORD for non-interactive/MCP use, and manage with
cicd-aiops secret set|list|remove|migrate. TLS verification defaults ON
(the init wizard asks before turning it off for lab certs).
MCP server
26 governed tools (20 reads incl. the four flagship analyses, 6 writes).
{
"mcpServers": {
"cicd-aiops": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": ["--from", "cicd-aiops", "cicd-aiops-mcp"],
"env": {
"CICD_AIOPS_MASTER_PASSWORD": "your-master-password"
}
}
}
}Env-block caveat: MCP clients launch the server with a minimal environment — your shell profile is not sourced. Anything the server needs (
CICD_AIOPS_MASTER_PASSWORD,CICD_AIOPS_HOME, and any optionalCICD_AUDIT_APPROVED_BYaudit annotation) must be set in theenvblock above, not in~/.zshrc.
Alternatively: cicd-aiops mcp (same server, CLI entry point).
Configuration
~/.cicd-aiops/config.yaml (the wizard writes this):
targets:
- name: gl1
platform: gitlab # or: gitea
base_url: https://git.example.com
verify_ssl: true # default ON; set false only for lab certsThe token for each target is stored encrypted under the target's name.
Relocate all state (config, audit, undo, secrets) with CICD_AIOPS_HOME.
Development
uv sync
uv run pytest -q
uv run ruff check .缺功能?
缺功能提 issue/PR 欢迎留言 — if a GitLab/Gitea surface you need is missing (runner administration on newer Gitea, per-job retry, scheduled pipelines, group-level rollups…), open an issue or PR at https://github.com/AIops-tools/CICD-AIops. The platform registry is designed so a new resource is one path-map entry, not a refactor.
License
MIT. GitLab is a trademark of GitLab Inc.; Gitea is a trademark of its project owners. This project is independent and not affiliated with either.
Maintenance
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/AIops-tools/CICD-AIops'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server