Skip to main content
Glama
AIops-tools

cicd-aiops

Related Servers

Alternatives to cicd-aiops

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Governed SSO/IAM operations for Keycloak and Authentik — login-failure, stale-permission, client-config, and MFA RCA, with unbypassable audit logging (MCP + CLI), budget/runaway guards, dry-run, and undo/rollback.
      29
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Governed Docker + Portainer container-host operations (non-Kubernetes) — restart-loop, resource-pressure, and image/volume-bloat RCA, with guarded lifecycle writes, unbypassable audit logging (MCP + CLI), budget/runaway guards, dry-run, and undo/rollback.
      38
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Governed Prometheus + Grafana operations — firing-alert and scrape-target RCA, alert noise/flapping analysis, silences, and dashboards, with unbypassable audit logging (MCP + CLI), budget/runaway guards, dry-run, and undo/rollback.
      39
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Governed reverse-proxy operations for Traefik, Caddy, and HAProxy — backend-health, cert-expiry, 5xx, and route-conflict RCA, with unbypassable audit logging (MCP + CLI), budget/runaway guards, dry-run, and undo/rollback.
      28
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Governed MinIO object-storage operations — capacity, exposure-surface audit, lifecycle, and healing RCA, with guarded bucket writes, unbypassable audit logging (MCP + CLI), budget/runaway guards, dry-run, and undo/rollback.
      48
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Governed MySQL + MariaDB DBA operations — slow-query, lock-wait/deadlock, replication, and fragmentation RCA, with unbypassable audit logging (MCP + CLI), budget/runaway guards, dry-run, and undo/rollback.
      35
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 28 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct area (pipelines, artifacts, runners, projects, branches, etc.) with clear, non-overlapping purposes. Even the analysis tools (pipeline_failure_rca, runner_health_rca) are distinct in their focus and don't overlap with the basic read tools.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a verb_noun pattern (e.g., list_projects, retry_pipeline), but a few use descriptive phrases (pipeline_failure_rca, artifact_storage_bloat_analysis, stale_work_audit) which breaks the pattern slightly. Overall consistent, but not perfectly uniform.

    Tool Count4/5

    28 tools is on the higher side, but each tool serves a specific purpose across CI/CD operations and AIOps analysis. The count is reasonable given the breadth of the domain, though it could be slightly trimmed.

    Completeness5/5

    The server covers a comprehensive set of CRUD-like reads, writes, and high-level diagnostic tools for CI/CD management. No obvious gaps; includes undo mechanisms and dry-run options for safety.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues