Skip to main content
Glama

web-data-mcp

CI License: MIT Node >=22

Quality-gated web data for AI agents. An MCP server that runs Apify scraping actors and — unlike a raw passthrough — validates what came back, scores it, retries with stronger anti-blocking settings when it's bad, and hands your agent embedding-ready chunks instead of a JSON dump.

demo: offline test suite and MCP Inspector listing the seven tools

Scraped data fails silently: the run "succeeds" but the dataset is a wall of Access Denied pages, half-empty records, or duplicates — and an agent that can't see quality will happily reason over garbage. This server makes data quality a first-class, machine-readable part of every tool result.

Quickstart

git clone https://github.com/fctpe/web-data-mcp && cd web-data-mcp
pnpm install && pnpm build

# poke every tool in a UI
APIFY_TOKEN=your-token npx @modelcontextprotocol/inspector node dist/index.js

# Claude Code
claude mcp add web-data --env APIFY_TOKEN=your-token -- node /path/to/web-data-mcp/dist/index.js

# Claude Desktop / Cursor / any stdio client — add to your MCP config:
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "web-data": {
      "command": "node",
      "args": ["/path/to/web-data-mcp/dist/index.js"],
      "env": { "APIFY_TOKEN": "your-token" }
    }
  }
}

(npx -y web-data-mcp will replace the node path once the first npm release is published — the bin entry is already wired.)

Free Apify accounts include $5/month of platform credit — enough for hundreds of scrape_url calls with the default cheerio crawler.

Related MCP server: crawl4ai-mcp-server

Why not the official Apify MCP server?

Use both — they solve different problems.

apify/apify-mcp-server

web-data-mcp

Scope

The whole Apify store (5,000+ actors), dynamic discovery

7 curated tools around one workflow

Output

Raw dataset passthrough

Schema-validated, quality-scored, token-budgeted

Bad scrapes

Your agent finds out the hard way

Scored (quality.score), auto-retried with escalating anti-blocking settings

RAG

Bring your own chunking

dataset_to_rag_documents: token-bounded chunks, overlap, stable content-hash ids

Guardrails

Platform-level

Actor allowlist, SSRF guard (no private hosts), clamped memory/timeouts, hard response token caps

flowchart LR
    A[AI agent] -->|MCP| S[web-data-mcp]
    S --> R[Run actor]
    R --> Q{Quality gate<br/>schema · completeness<br/>dupes · bot-wall}
    Q -->|score >= threshold| C[Chunked, token-bounded,<br/>hash-addressed documents]
    Q -->|score < threshold| E[Escalate: residential proxies,<br/>browser crawler] --> R
    C --> A

Tools

Tool

What it does

scrape_url

One call: crawl a URL → wait → score → auto-retry if blocked → return markdown + quality block

run_actor

Start an allowlisted actor with explicit input; returns run_id / dataset_id handles

get_run_status

Poll a run (read-only, free)

fetch_dataset_items

Paginated reads with field projection, summary/items modes, hard token budget

validate_dataset

Score a dataset against your JSON Schema: pass rate, completeness, dupes, bot-wall rate

retry_low_quality_run

Re-run with residential proxies → browser crawler until quality clears your threshold

dataset_to_rag_documents

Emit embedding-ready chunks (jsonl/markdown/text) with source attribution + content hashes

Every tool ships inputSchema and outputSchema (structured output), behavior annotations (readOnlyHint, openWorldHint, …), and returns failures as model-readable isError results with a concrete next step — so the calling agent can self-correct instead of stalling.

What the agent actually gets back

The point is that data quality is structured, not buried in prose. A validate_dataset result (or the quality block on scrape_url) looks like this — the agent can branch on score, and sample_failures tells it exactly what's wrong:

{
  "quality": {
    "score": 0.42,                    // composite 0..1 — below threshold, don't trust
    "item_count": 50,
    "schema_pass_rate": 0.30,         // 70% of items fail your JSON Schema
    "field_completeness": 0.61,
    "duplicate_rate": 0.12,
    "suspected_block_rate": 0.24,     // ~1 in 4 items look like a bot wall
    "sample_failures": [
      "item[3]/price: must be number",
      "item[7]: 'Attention Required | Cloudflare' in body"
    ]
  }
}

And a dataset_to_rag_documents line — token-bounded, source-attributed, content-hashed for idempotent upserts:

{ "id": "a1b2c3d4e5f6-0", "source": "https://example.com/p/12", "chunkIndex": 0,
  "chunkCount": 1, "tokenCount": 118, "content": "…clean extracted text…",
  "metadata": { "crawledAt": "2026-07-12T…" } }

How the quality gate works

Each dataset sample is scored 0..1 from four signals:

  • Schema pass rate — items validated against your JSON Schema (Ajv), weighted 0.4 when present

  • Field completeness — non-empty cells across the union of fields

  • Duplicate rate — hash-based duplicate detection

  • Bot-wall rate — items containing block markers (Access Denied, captcha, verify you are human, …)

Blocking is a ceiling, not a deduction. The final score is min(weighted, 1 - bot_wall_rate): a batch cannot score higher than the fraction of it that is actually content. Blocking also gets its own retry trigger (suspected_block_rate > 0.2) independent of the score, because a partly blocked batch caps above the threshold — 25% walls caps at 0.75 — and a quarter of your pages being walls is exactly what a residential proxy is for. Why it is a ceiling and not a weighted term, and the test that attacks it: ADR 0005 and test/blocked-content.test.ts.

These are heuristics. The bot-wall regex catches common block pages, not all of them, and field completeness treats every field as equally important. Schema pass rate is the signal to rely on when you can supply a schema.

Below threshold, retries escalate: original input → + residential proxies → + playwright:firefox with dynamic-content waits. Attempts and both scores are reported in the structured result, and exhausted retries return an isError result that tells the agent why and what to try next — naming a bot wall as a bot wall rather than as "low quality", since a model told the content is thin will summarise the wall as if it were the page.

Results

Reproducible from this repository: 106 offline tests (pnpm test, no network, no token) plus a real stdio protocol round trip through the client library the repo already depends on — node scripts/stdio-smoke.mjs prints smoke ok — 7 tools, all with output schemas, guard + tool call live.

Beyond that, the full MCP flow (run → status → fetch → validate → RAG) was pressure-tested against three production Apify actors with real workloads. Those runs committed no artifact and are not reproducible here — reproducing them needs an APIFY_TOKEN and named actor slugs — so no quality score or item count from them is quoted. scripts/live-smoke.mjs is the documented path for anyone with a token to run the same flow against their own actor and read the numbers off their own output.

What the live runs did leave behind is checkable: two bugs the mocked tests could not catch, each now pinned by a regression test in test/review-regressions.test.ts:

  1. Apify's dataset itemCount is eventually consistent — it reads 0 for a few seconds after a run finishes. Pagination now floors the total at what was actually fetched.

  2. A 245-token CDN image URL out-lengthed the ad copy in the RAG auto-detect fallback, producing well-formed garbage embeddings. Content detection now requires prose shape (whitespace ratio, non-URL) and skips items honestly instead.

HTTP mode

WEB_DATA_MCP_HTTP_TOKEN=$(openssl rand -hex 24) node dist/index.js --transport http --port 3000

Binds to 127.0.0.1 with Host/Origin validation (DNS-rebinding protection) and constant-time bearer auth. Built on the MCP TypeScript SDK v2 (spec 2026-07-28); 2025-era clients are served through the SDK's built-in legacy fallback.

Tracing (optional)

pnpm add @opentelemetry/api @opentelemetry/sdk-trace-base @opentelemetry/exporter-trace-otlp-http
OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT=http://127.0.0.1:4318 node dist/index.js

One span per tool call, named execute_tool <tool>, carrying gen_ai.operation.name, gen_ai.tool.name, and — for the tools that score their data — web_data_mcp.quality.score, so a bad scrape is visible in the trace and not just in the tool result. Failed calls get span status ERROR. OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_TRACES_ENDPOINT is honoured too and, as the standard requires, wins over the base endpoint.

Export is OTLP/HTTP only, with no console exporter — stdout belongs to the MCP protocol stream. An endpoint that is not an http(s) URL turns tracing off with a message naming the variable rather than dropping every span in silence, and with neither variable set the SDK is never imported at all, so the packages above are genuinely optional peers. The stdout/stderr rules and what the spans may carry are in SECURITY.md.

Example: LangGraph agent

examples/langgraph-agent wires the server into a LangGraph agent whose system prompt enforces the quality contract ("if score < 0.7, say so instead of trusting the content"):

cd examples/langgraph-agent
npm install
OPENAI_API_KEY=... APIFY_TOKEN=... npm start -- "https://apify.com/pricing"

Limitations

  • Quality scoring is heuristic (see above). Schema pass rate is the signal to rely on when you can provide a schema.

  • Escalation strategies (crawlerType, dynamicContentWaitSecs) target apify/website-content-crawler-style inputs; other actors get proxy escalation only, and unknown input keys are passed through untouched.

  • retry_low_quality_run re-runs the whole actor input — it does not retry only failed URLs within a run.

  • No streaming: long crawls block up to the wait budget (300s default). Fire-and-forget via run_actor + polling is the workaround for bigger jobs.

  • Tested against apify-client 2.x and MCP SDK 2.0.0-beta.3 (pinned); the pin will move to v2 stable when it ships.

Design notes

Architecture decisions are recorded in docs/adr/: curated tools vs. dynamic discovery, SDK v2 beta, the dependency-injected gateway that keeps the whole test suite offline and sub-second, hard token budgets with explicit handles, and why blocking caps the quality score. Security posture (token handling, URL guard, transport auth) is in SECURITY.md.

Development

pnpm test        # offline test suite incl. full client<->server integration
pnpm lint && pnpm typecheck
pnpm inspect     # build + MCP Inspector
node scripts/stdio-smoke.mjs                                 # protocol round trip against dist/
OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT=http://127.0.0.1:4318 node scripts/stdio-smoke.mjs   # same, tracing on
APIFY_TOKEN=... SMOKE_ACTOR=... node scripts/live-smoke.mjs   # pre-release live smoke

Built with AI-assisted scaffolding; architecture, quality heuristics, tool contracts, and tests are hand-designed — see the ADRs for the reasoning.

License

MIT

Available Tools

7 tools
dataset_to_rag_documentsConvert dataset to RAG documentsA
Read-onlyIdempotent

Turn scraped items into embedding-ready documents: token-bounded chunks with overlap, source attribution, stable content-hash ids for idempotent vector upserts, and selected metadata. Paginate with offset/limit for large datasets.

Inputs: dataset_id (required), limit, format, offset, +5 more. Returns: documents, truncated, dataset_id, next_offset, +2 more

fetch_dataset_itemsFetch dataset itemsA
Read-onlyIdempotent

Read items from an actor run dataset with pagination, field projection, and a hard token budget. Start with response_format "summary" to see the shape cheaply, then fetch "items" with a fields projection. Items arrive as JSON in the text content; structured content carries pagination metadata (total, next_offset, truncated).

Inputs: dataset_id (required), limit, fields, offset, +2 more. Returns: total, offset, returned, truncated, +3 more

get_run_statusGet actor run statusA
Read-onlyIdempotent

Check whether an actor run has finished and where its dataset is. Free and safe to poll.

Inputs: run_id (required). Returns: run_id, status, finished, dataset_id, +3 more

retry_low_quality_runRetry a low-quality runA

Re-run an actor with progressively stronger anti-blocking settings (residential proxies, then a browser crawler) until the dataset quality score reaches the threshold or attempts are exhausted. Each attempt costs Apify credits.

Inputs: run_id (required), threshold, json_schema, max_attempts. Returns: attempts, final_run_id, final_quality, initial_quality, +2 more

run_actorRun an Apify actorA

Start an allowlisted Apify actor with an explicit input object. Returns run_id and dataset_id handles for get_run_status / fetch_dataset_items / validate_dataset. Costs Apify credits. Prefer scrape_url for simple page scrapes.

Inputs: actor_id (required), input, memory_mb, wait_secs, +1 more. Returns: run_id, status, dataset_id, status_message

scrape_urlScrape a URL (quality-gated)A

Scrape a public web page into clean markdown in one call: runs a crawler, waits, scores the result (completeness, bot-wall detection), and automatically retries with stronger settings when quality is low. Costs Apify credits per run. For arbitrary actors or fire-and-forget runs use run_actor instead.

Inputs: url (required), max_pages, max_tokens, quality_retry. Returns: pages, run_id, quality, attempts, +2 more

validate_datasetValidate dataset qualityA
Read-onlyIdempotent

Score a dataset before trusting it: schema pass rate (if a JSON Schema is given), field completeness, duplicate rate, and bot-wall detection. Use the score to decide between consuming the data and retry_low_quality_run.

Inputs: dataset_id (required), json_schema, sample_size. Returns: total, quality, sampled, dataset_id

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Loading tool schema changelog…

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct role: run management, scraping, actor execution, data retrieval, quality validation, retry logic, and RAG conversion. Overlapping tools like scrape_url and run_actor are explicitly differentiated in their descriptions, so an agent can reliably select the correct one.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (get_run_status, scrape_url, run_actor, fetch_dataset_items, validate_dataset, retry_low_quality_run). The exception is dataset_to_rag_documents, which lacks a leading verb and breaks the pattern, though it remains readable and unambiguous.

    Tool Count5/5

    Seven tools is a well-scoped count for a web data extraction and processing server. Each tool addresses a distinct step in the pipeline without redundancy, making the set feel complete yet not overwhelming.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface covers the full lifecycle: initiating extractions (scrape_url/run_actor), monitoring runs (get_run_status), fetching results (fetch_dataset_items), validating quality (validate_dataset), improving results (retry_low_quality_run), and preparing output for downstream use (dataset_to_rag_documents). No critical gaps are apparent for the stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues

    Related MCP Connectors

    Related MCP Servers