Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to localSMTP-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides MCP tools to manage MailDev Docker containers and inspect received emails, including listing, searching, retrieving, deleting, waiting for, and verifying email content and attachments for local development and test automation.
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A minimal MCP server for reading, searching, managing, and sending email over IMAP and SMTP.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      D
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server implementation that allows sending emails over MailPace's fast transactional email API.
      1
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A minimal MCP server for reading and sending emails via IMAP/SMTP, supporting multiple accounts in a single instance with zero external dependencies.
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Exposes any IMAP mailbox and SMTP relay as MCP tools, enabling email management (read, search, send, delete) through MCP-compatible agents.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for the Guerrilla Mail temporary/disposable email API. Spin up throwaway inboxes, poll for mail, and read messages from any MCP client.
      6
      7 npm
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinct purpose: clearing all messages, retrieving a specific message, checking server status, and listing messages. No overlap in functionality.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., clear_messages, get_message), making it predictable for agents.

    Tool Count5/5

    With only 4 tools, the set is well-scoped for a local SMTP server, covering essential operations without unnecessary bloat.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers core operations (list, get, clear, status) but lacks individual message deletion or filtering, which could be useful but not critical.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues