Skip to main content
Glama
fbossiere

Proton Safe MCP

by fbossiere

Related Servers

Alternatives to Proton Safe MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to interact with Proton Mail through a self-hosted server that works alongside Proton Mail Bridge. It provides read-only mailbox tools such as listing folders, searching mail, and retrieving messages while keeping Bridge isolated from the network.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A security-first MCP server that provides AI agents with a scoped, read-and-draft-only view into Proton Mail via Proton Bridge, ensuring no emails can be sent and access is restricted to configured workspaces.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A read-only MCP server that connects to Proton Mail via Proton Bridge, enabling AI assistants to search, list, and read emails securely without leaving your machine.
      4
      16 npm
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A lightweight MCP server providing AI agents a scoped, read-and-draft-only view into Proton Mail via Proton Bridge, with code-enforced restrictions preventing external access or sending.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that reads, searches, organizes, and deletes Proton Mail through the local Proton Mail Bridge, with read-only mode and sender authentication checks. It cannot send mail.
      67 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.5/5.0

    Scored across 13 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: mailbox status, folder listing, sender addresses, message listing/search/read, reply context, attachment staging steps, and draft creation are all cleanly separated. Even similar tools like read_message and get_reply_context are explicitly differentiated by their roles.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The vast majority of tools follow a verb_noun pattern (list_messages, search_messages, read_message, create_confirmed_draft, begin_attachment_upload). The main deviation is mailbox_status, which is a noun phrase rather than an action-oriented name, but this is minor and does not cause confusion.

    Tool Count5/5

    Thirteen tools is well-scoped for the email reading, searching, attachment handling, and draft creation workflow the server supports. The attachment upload is appropriately split into three steps, and no tool feels redundant or unnecessary.

    Completeness4/5

    The server covers the core mail workflow: mailbox status, folders, senders, listing, searching, reading, reply context, attachment staging, and draft creation. The main gaps are the lack of draft update/delete tools and sending being intentionally left to the user in Proton Mail, which are reasonable limitations rather than critical dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive