A
licenseNot graded
qualityD
maintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for Hubstaff API integration, enabling seamless time tracking, project management, and team collaboration through AI assistants.
4
MIT
hubstify-mcp
by farce1
Related Servers
Alternatives to hubstify-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceRead-only MCP server for Hubstaff Time Tracking and Tasks APIs, providing tasks, comments, hours, and project data. Supports OAuth 2.1 for ChatGPT integration.-
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceMCP Server for extracting Time Doctor time tracking data via AI assistants.42MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that lets LLMs interact with your Clockify workspace for time-tracking automation and reporting, enabling natural language logging of time entries, querying entries, and generating reports.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for Toggl Focus 2.0, enabling project, task, and time-entry management with live timer control through natural language.2410 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceA local Model Context Protocol server that enables secure interaction with self-hosted ActiveCollab instances. It allows users to query projects, tasks, time records, and team notifications through natural language while keeping API credentials local.-
TDQS
B3.4/5.0
Scored across 10 tools
Disambiguation4/5
Most tools have clearly distinct purposes. However, `daily_activities` and `list_activities` both deal with tracked time and could cause confusion if an agent does not read the descriptions carefully.
Naming Consistency3/5
The `hubstaff_` prefix is consistent, but the verb pattern is mixed: most use verb_noun (e.g., `list_projects`, `create_task`), but `daily_activities` uses an adjective instead of a verb, and `raw_request` is adjective_noun. `get_` vs `list_` is acceptable for single vs multiple.
Tool Count5/5
10 tools is well-scoped for a Hubstaff API client. Each tool covers a distinct resource (organizations, projects, tasks, members, activities, current user) and the set is not overwhelming.
Completeness3/5
Core read and create operations are present for tasks, projects, and activities. However, there are no update or delete tools for any resource, and time tracking actions like start/stop are missing. The `raw_request` tool can fill gaps but reduces the dedicated surface.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessUnresponsive