render_map
Save the current map view as an image file with custom dimensions.
Instructions
Render the current map view to an image file with the specified dimensions.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| path | Yes | ||
| width | No | ||
| height | No |
Save the current map view as an image file with custom dimensions.
Render the current map view to an image file with the specified dimensions.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| path | Yes | ||
| width | No | ||
| height | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only states the basic action, omitting details like file format, overwrite behavior, and error handling.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single concise sentence with no redundancy. However, it could be slightly more informative without losing conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema, no annotations, and no parameter descriptions, the description is insufficiently complete. Important details like image format and behavior are missing.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must explain parameters. It only mentions 'specified dimensions' but does not describe 'path', which is required and critical.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'render' and the resource 'current map view to an image file', specifying dimensions. It is distinct from sibling tools which focus on layers and projects.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor does it mention prerequisites or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/fani-ko/qgis_mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server