Skip to main content
Glama
famtong8-dev

W3 MCP LSP Server

by famtong8-dev
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to W3 MCP LSP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Codex LSP Bridge

      CesarPetrescu
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Exposes Language Server Protocol (LSP) features as MCP tools, enabling IDE-grade semantic navigation including go-to-definition, find references, hover info, and symbols across multiple programming languages (Python, Rust, C/C++, TypeScript/JavaScript, React, HTML, CSS).
      3
      MIT

    • ts-mcp-server

      AndyLiner13
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A lightweight MCP server that provides 40 tools for TypeScript/JavaScript refactoring and code intelligence, directly mapping to TypeScript's tsserver protocol commands for accurate structural changes and workspace analysis.
      40
      20 npm
      3
      MIT

    • vue-ts-lsp

      enc0ded
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Self-contained MCP server providing type-aware code intelligence for TypeScript, JavaScript, and Vue files, exposing tools like hover, definition, references, and diagnostics to Claude Code without requiring global language server installations.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct LSP operation: definition lookup, hover information, and reference search. There is no overlap in their purposes, making selection unambiguous.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools share the 'lsp_' prefix and follow an action-oriented naming pattern. However, 'lsp_hover' lacks the object component found in 'lsp_goto_definition' and 'lsp_find_references', creating a minor structural inconsistency.

    Tool Count5/5

    The three tools represent a focused, minimal set of LSP navigation features. Each earns its place without unnecessary bloat, and the count falls within the well-scoped range.

    Completeness3/5

    The core navigation operations (definition, hover, references) are covered, providing a usable foundation. However, other common LSP features such as document symbols, implementation, or code completion are missing, which could require workarounds for certain tasks.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources