Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to h5p-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to programmatically create, validate, store, and hot-swap interactive quizzes and study bundles into a desktop learning application, with analytics and local REST integration.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agents to create, inspect, and edit self-contained HTML presentation decks through semantic tools, validate them against the htmldeck/v1 contract, hand them to a local visual editor, and export them as standalone HTML, PDF, or per-slide PNG.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to read and edit Korean HWP/HWPX documents, including converting Hanyang PUA old-Hangul characters to Unicode jamo, diagnosing unsupported characters, and preserving arae-a, panch'im, yet-ieung, expanded jamo, filler and side dots. Also supports HWPX search-and-replace, template filling, paragraph/table/image/style editing, page rendering to SVG/HTML, and creating new HWPX documents.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents with local file-processing capabilities for token counting, RAG chunking, CSV/JSON conversion, QR generation, and more, while keeping documents private on the user's machine.
      7
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct role: listing supported H5P types and their field schemas, building a package, reading an existing package, and reporting server metadata. There is no overlapping behavior that would make tool selection ambiguous.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Three core tools follow a clear verb_noun_h5p pattern (list_h5p_types, build_h5p, read_h5p), making their relationship obvious. server_info is a minor deviation, but the overall convention remains readable and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Four tools are well-scoped for a package builder: schema discovery, build, read, and server metadata. No tool feels redundant, and the surface is compact without being thin.

    Completeness4/5

    The core lifecycle of discovering types, building validated packages, and reading packages is covered. Upload/deployment is explicitly out of scope, but the surface otherwise lacks no obvious operation needed for content-only package work.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive