The two tools have completely distinct purposes: generate_images creates new images via AI, while create_image_html produces HTML img tags from existing file paths. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.

Both tool names follow a verb_noun pattern (generate_images and create_image_html). The verbs 'generate' and 'create' are similar but not identical, and the nouns differ in structure (plural vs. compound), but the overall pattern is consistent and readable.

With only 2 tools, the server feels somewhat thin. While the scope is narrow (image generation and HTML formatting), this is borderline on the low end; a small utility set would benefit from at least one additional tool for managing or inspecting generated images.

The core workflow of generating images and then creating HTML for viewing is covered, but there are notable gaps: no way to list, delete, or manage previously generated images, and no tool to adjust model parameters beyond what might be embedded in generate_images. This limits the server to a single-generation flow.