ssh_shell_send_control

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description bears full burden. It states sending control characters modifies shell state, lists common keys and their effects, and mentions return of confirmation and output. Lacks disclosure of potential disruptive side effects or error handling.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Highly concise and well-structured: purpose first, then key list, then args, then returns. Every sentence adds value with no redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers purpose, params, and returns. For a simple 2-param tool with output schema present, it is mostly complete. Could add notes on invalid keys or session handle validation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema coverage, description adds meaning: session_id is from ssh_connect, key is a single letter. Explicitly maps values to control characters, compensating well for missing schema descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Specifies verb 'Send' and resource 'control character to the interactive shell'. Clearly distinguishes from sibling ssh_shell_send (which sends text) by focusing on control characters.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Lists common control keys with explanations, guiding when to use (e.g., Ctrl+C for interrupt). However, does not explicitly state when not to use or contrast with alternatives like ssh_shell_send.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.