Skip to main content
Glama
fair2wise

Materials Project MCP

by fair2wise

Related Servers

Alternatives to Materials Project MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides AI assistants with access to materials science databases, enabling search and analysis of material properties, crystal structures, phase diagrams, and elastic properties through the Materials Project API.
      10
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      The Materials Project MCP Server is server that provides programmatic access to the Materials Project database. It enables LLMs, to search, analyze, and retrieve up to date materials science data.
      13
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables natural language querying of OPTIMADE-compatible material databases like Materials Project and Materials Cloud via the Model Context Protocol. It provides tools for linting query filters, discovering database providers, and accessing full structured data results as MCP resources.
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides computed (DFT) materials structures and thermodynamic properties through the Pipeworx MCP gateway, enabling AI agents to query materials data via natural language or tool calls.
      2 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to verify the novelty and validity of invented battery materials, with support for searching and validating against a materials database.
      2
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: find_materials_by_formula searches by chemical formula, get_material_details retrieves detailed information by ID, and get_materials_with_elements searches by element composition. There is no overlap in functionality, making tool selection unambiguous for an agent.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with snake_case (e.g., find_materials_by_formula, get_material_details, get_materials_with_elements). The naming is predictable and readable throughout the set.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 3 tools, the set feels thin for a materials science domain, which might involve more operations like filtering by properties, comparing materials, or updating data. While the tools cover basic search and retrieval, the count is borderline for comprehensive coverage.

    Completeness3/5

    The tools provide essential search and retrieval functions (by formula, ID, and elements), but there are notable gaps. For a materials database, operations like filtering by material properties (e.g., band gap, stability), sorting, or pagination are missing, which could limit agent workflows in more complex tasks.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues