Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
GenImgMCP

GenImgMCP

by fabiojbg
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to GenImgMCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • OpenRouter Image Generation

      hz1ulqu01gmnZH4
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables image generation via OpenRouter API, supporting models like Gemini 2.5 Flash Image Preview with options to save files locally.
      2
      1
      Do What The F*ck You Want To Public

    • image-gen-mcp

      nuver-labs
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to generate and edit images using Gemini and OpenAI image models, saving files directly into the project with configurable providers, models, and security restrictions.
      3
      107 npm
      1
      MIT

    • workbuddy-gpt-image

      naipi11
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables generating and editing images from within WorkBuddy conversations by routing requests through a local OpenCodex Responses proxy to a custom GPT's hosted image generation tool, returning validated image previews and saved local file paths. It also supports reference-image edits, job status polling, cancellation, and backend model checks, with output directory and reference-read restrictions.
      4
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    generate_image and edit_image have clearly distinct purposes: one creates new images from a prompt, while the other transforms an existing local image. There is no meaningful overlap or ambiguity between the two tools.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern: generate_image and edit_image. The naming is predictable, clear, and uniform.

    Tool Count3/5

    Two tools is on the thin side for an image generation/editing server, even though both are core operations. The count is borderline but not unreasonable for a minimal focused toolset.

    Completeness4/5

    The server covers the two primary image operations: generation and editing. It lacks supporting operations like listing locally saved images or deleting them, but these are minor gaps that agents can work around using file paths.

    Resources