anvisa-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to anvisa-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables LLMs to search FDA drug labels and adverse event data via the OpenFDA API, supporting natural language queries for drug safety information.2MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to query and analyze FDA adverse events, drug labels, medical device clearances, and other public health datasets through natural language commands.14-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables natural-language querying of Brazilian public health indicators from DataSUS microdata — mortality, dengue, hospitalizations, ICSAP, and births — through 41 tools covering consultation, analysis (peer-stratum comparison, dengue endemic channel, weekly bulletin), reliability warnings, and anomaly detection. It runs locally against the public API with anti-hallucination rules so every figure comes from a tool with its source cited.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for querying the official ANVISA electronic drug bulletin from a trusted source. It provides a single read-only tool for consulting drug information through natural language in any MCP-compatible client.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceProvides LLM-optimized access to FDA data through the OpenFDA API and direct regulatory decision document retrieval, covering all 21 OpenFDA endpoints plus 510(k) summaries, De Novo decisions, and PMA approvals.41MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to access FDA and ClinicalTrials.gov data for medical device compliance, adverse event monitoring, and regulatory due diligence.-
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools are clearly separated by target entity: one queries medicine registrations, the other lists recent Class III/IV medical devices with AI classification. There is no functional overlap or plausible confusion between them.
Both tool names follow a consistent Portuguese snake_case verb-first pattern: 'consultar_' and 'buscar_'. The structure is predictable and matches the action each tool performs.
With only two tools, the server feels thin for a domain as broad as Anvisa regulatory data. The tools are meaningful and well-scoped, but the count sits at the low end of the borderline range.
The server covers only two narrow queries: medicine status lookup and recent device listings. It lacks many obvious operations for a regulatory database, such as querying devices by name/registration, retrieving full registration details, or tracking changes over time.