A
licenseNot graded
qualityD
maintenanceEnables interaction with the Anki desktop app for spaced repetition learning. Supports reviewing due cards, creating new flashcards, and managing study sessions through natural language commands.
MIT
AnkiConnect MCP Server
by fabianissam
Related Servers
Alternatives to AnkiConnect MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage Anki flashcard decks and cards through natural language, supporting deck creation, card additions (basic and cloze types), and review queue management.66 npm2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables to interact with your Anki collection through natural language, allowing you to study, edit, and analyze flashcards without external dependencies.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceConnects Claude to Anki flashcard software via AnkiConnect, enabling users to review due cards, create flashcards, and manage spaced repetition learning through natural language conversations.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI tools to manage Anki flashcards, including deck management, card search, creation, editing, deletion, and statistics.1034 npm3Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables LLMs to interact with Anki flashcard collections, including deck management, note search, viewing contents, and editing fields.12 npmMIT
TDQS
A4.2/5.0
Scored across 6 tools
Disambiguation4/5
Most tools have clearly distinct purposes: listing decks, listing cards in a deck, fetching one card, adding, searching, and editing. list_deck_cards and search_cards overlap somewhat as card-retrieval operations, but their descriptions explicitly separate systematic review from targeted lookup.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tool names follow a consistent lower_snake_case verb_noun pattern: list_decks, list_deck_cards, get_card, add_card, search_cards, edit_card. The naming is predictable and easy to navigate.
Tool Count5/5
Six tools is a well-scoped set for an Anki card and deck workflow. Each tool covers a distinct functional action without unnecessary redundancy and the count feels appropriate for the server's purpose.
Completeness4/5
The server covers core card lifecycle operations well: listing decks, viewing cards, adding cards, searching, and editing cards. The main gap is the lack of a delete_card tool, and there is minimal deck-management coverage beyond listing, but the primary review-oriented workflow is well supported.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues