dagster-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to dagster-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that gives AI assistants the ability to connect to, query, profile, and monitor data sources — turning any LLM into an interactive data engineering copilot.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server that gives AI agents observability over their own tool calls, enabling auditing, cost tracking, latency analysis, and alerting.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn intelligent MCP server that gives AI agents full control over GitHub Actions CI/CD pipelines, including real-time monitoring, log analysis, AI-powered failure diagnosis, and deployment management.13245 npm1ISC
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that gives AI agents real-time observability into Apache Kafka clusters, enabling natural language queries for broker health, consumer lag, and diagnostics.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA multi-agent MCP server that turns LLMs into an autonomous incident-response copilot, enabling rapid investigation, correlation, and remediation of production incidents.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server providing intelligence infrastructure for AI agent pipelines, including vector memory, drift detection, model routing, skills discovery, session management, codebase indexing, and context compression, all running locally with zero LLM/API calls.1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 17 tools
Run-inspection tools (get_runs, get_run_status, get_run_logs, get_run_stats, get_run_failure_summary) overlap in scope, but the descriptions explicitly cross-reference each other and state when to prefer one over another (e.g. get_run_failure_summary over get_run_logs). Asset tools (search_assets, get_asset_details, get_asset_health, get_recent_materializations) are similarly well-delineated. Only mild potential confusion remains between stats/logs/failure_summary for a failed run.
All tools follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (get_runs, list_schedules, search_assets, resolve_asset_selection, get_instance_status). Verbs are used predictably: list_/search_ for discovery, get_ for detail, resolve_ for computation. No mixed conventions.
17 tools is on the heavier side but each covers a distinct slice of Dagster monitoring (runs, assets, schedules, sensors, ticks, code locations, instance health). Nothing feels redundant, though the set is slightly large for a read-only monitoring surface.
Read/observability coverage is strong, but several descriptions reference tools that are absent from the set (materialize_assets, backfill_assets, launch_job, reload_code_location), creating dead-end references an agent may follow. No write/action tools exist despite the server hinting at them, so lifecycle coverage is incomplete.