f2c-mcp-server
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Server capabilities have not been inspected yet.
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| figma_get_file_dataC | Get detailed information about a Figma file |
| figma_get_imagesC | Get images of Figma nodes |
| figma_get_image_fillsB | Get all image resources in the specified Figma file |
| figma_get_file_metaB | Get metadata information for a Figma file |
| figma_to_codeB | Convert Figma designs into code. This tool extracts specified Figma nodes and transforms them into HTML, React with CSS Modules, or React with Tailwind CSS, facilitating automated design-to-code conversion. |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 5 tools
The tools have some overlap in purpose, particularly between 'figma_get_file_data' and 'figma_get_file_meta', which could cause confusion about which to use for general file information. However, descriptions help clarify distinctions, such as 'figma_get_image_fills' for image resources versus 'figma_get_images' for node images, and 'figma_to_code' has a unique conversion function.
All tool names follow a consistent 'figma_' prefix with snake_case and descriptive verb_noun patterns, such as 'get_file_data' and 'to_code'. There are no deviations in naming conventions, making the set predictable and easy to understand.
With 5 tools, the count is reasonable for a Figma-to-code server, covering data retrieval, image handling, and conversion. It's slightly under the ideal range for comprehensive coverage but well-scoped for core functionalities without being overwhelming.
The tool set covers key operations like retrieving file data, metadata, images, and converting to code, but there are notable gaps, such as missing update or delete operations for Figma files, and no tools for managing design components or handling user interactions, which limits full lifecycle coverage in the design-to-code domain.