Skip to main content
Glama
mcp-github-gitlab-pr-security-and-compliance-reviewer

mcp-github-gitlab-pr-security-and-compliance-reviewer

mcp-github-gitlab-pr-security-and-compliance-reviewer

Zero-Cost Deterministic GitHub & GitLab Pull Request Security, OWASP, WCAG 2.2 AA & SOC 2 Compliance Reviewer MCP Server

๐ŸŒ Live Interactive Storefront & Instant URL Grader: https://ronanchnlps-bit.github.io | ๐Ÿ“Š 200 Live Enterprise Audit Dossiers: https://ronanchnlps-bit.github.io/dossiers/index.html

โšก Instant Zero-Install Execution (npx)

npx -y github:ronanchnlps-bit/mcp-github-gitlab-pr-security-and-compliance-reviewer --help

Related MCP server: Security & GRC MCP Server

๐Ÿ’ณ Commercial Licensing & 48-Hour Done-For-You Remediation Sprints (Zero-Call Async Checkout)

Tier

Deliverable

Price

Instant Checkout (PayPal / Card)

1. Pro Commercial License

Unlimited CI/CD & Production Repos + Commercial SARIF/VPAT Export

$49.00

๐Ÿ’ณ Buy Pro License ($49.00) โ†’

2. Instant Quick-Fix Patch Pack

Pre-Built Edge Worker + /llms.txt + security.txt + Draft VPAT 2.5

$99.00

๐Ÿ”ฅ Buy Instant Patch Pack ($99) โ†’

3. 48-Hour Done-For-You Sprint

Full Turnkey Pull Request Remediation + Signed ITI VPAT 2.5 ACR + 7-Day SLA

$1,497.00

โšก Order 48h Done-For-You Sprint ($1,497) โ†’

4. Continuous Monthly Retainer

Automated Weekly Drift Scans + PR Gatekeeping + Certificate Renewal

$299/mo

๐Ÿ”„ Activate Monthly Retainer ($299/mo) โ†’


๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ MCP GitHub / GitLab PR Diff Security, Secret Leak & WCAG Compliance Reviewer

Commercial-Grade Model Context Protocol (MCP) Server, CLI & Interactive Studio for Automated Pull Request DevSecOps Auditing
Inspects unified Git diffs (.patch / git diff), staged commits, and CI/CD pull request payloads across 4 Simultaneous DevSecOps & Compliance Gates with Zero API Cost and 100% Local Execution.

Smithery MCP Glama MCP NPM Version OASIS SARIF v2.1.0 License: MIT


๐Ÿ’ผ Commercial Positioning & Problem Solved

Modern engineering teams building with Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, and GitHub Copilot face a compounding PR review bottleneck:

  1. Secret & Key Infiltration: AI code generation frequently autofills hardcoded API keys (sk_live_..., AKIA..., ghp_..., eyJ...) into frontend and backend diffs.

  2. Injection Vulnerabilities: Accidental unparameterized SQL concatenation, dangerouslySetInnerHTML bypasses, and unvalidated SSRF fetches slip past manual reviews.

  3. Accessibility & Regulatory Lawsuits: Under the European Accessibility Act (EU EAA) and ADA Title II, missing alt tags, keyboard focus removals (outline-none), and non-interactive div click handlers trigger substantial statutory fines.

  4. EU AI Act Article 50 & Database Exposure: Added LLM chatbot components lacking mandatory AI transparency notices violate EU Art. 50, and new PostgreSQL tables deployed without Row Level Security (RLS) expose private tenant data through PostgREST/GraphQL.

Existing cloud SaaS solutions (Snyk, SonarCloud) charge thousands per seat and require outbound code uploads.
mcp-github-gitlab-pr-security-and-compliance-reviewer runs entirely locally on your workstation or CI runner at zero API cost, delivering instant PR risk scores, committable inline GitHub/GitLab suggestion diffs, and OASIS SARIF v2.1.0 exports.


๐Ÿš€ The 4 Simultaneous DevSecOps & Compliance Gates

                               โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”
                               โ”‚           Unified Git Diff (.patch / PR Diff)          โ”‚
                               โ””โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”ฌโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”˜
                                                           โ”‚
              โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”ฌโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”ดโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”ฌโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”
              โ–ผ                        โ–ผ                                    โ–ผ                        โ–ผ
      โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”        โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”                    โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”        โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”
      โ”‚    Gate 1     โ”‚        โ”‚    Gate 2     โ”‚                    โ”‚    Gate 3     โ”‚        โ”‚    Gate 4     โ”‚
      โ”‚ Secret Leaks  โ”‚        โ”‚ OWASP Top 10  โ”‚                    โ”‚ WCAG 2.2 AA   โ”‚        โ”‚ EU AI Act &   โ”‚
      โ”‚ & Credentials โ”‚        โ”‚  & Injections โ”‚                    โ”‚  & EU EAA     โ”‚        โ”‚ Database RLS  โ”‚
      โ””โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”ฌโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”˜        โ””โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”ฌโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”˜                    โ””โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”ฌโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”˜        โ””โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”ฌโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”˜
              โ”‚                        โ”‚                                    โ”‚                        โ”‚
              โ–ผ                        โ–ผ                                    โ–ผ                        โ–ผ
         โ€ข AWS AKIA               โ€ข SQLi Concat                        โ€ข Missing img alt        โ€ข EU AI Act Art. 50
         โ€ข Stripe Live            โ€ข eval() / Function()                โ€ข Button type/label        disclosure notice
         โ€ข Supabase JWT           โ€ข Raw dangerous HTML                 โ€ข outline-none focus     โ€ข CREATE TABLE
         โ€ข OpenAI/Claude          โ€ข SSRF fetch(req.query)              โ€ข div onClick a11y         without ENABLE
         โ€ข GitHub PAT             โ€ข Path traversal                     โ€ข Undersized targets       ROW LEVEL SECURITY
         โ€ข PEM Private Keys       โ€ข Insecure Cookies                     (<44x44px)
              โ”‚                        โ”‚                                    โ”‚                        โ”‚
              โ””โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”ดโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”ฌโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”ดโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”˜
                                                           โ”‚
                                                           โ–ผ
                                      โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”
                                      โ”‚ PR Risk Score (0โ€“100) & Merge Decision   โ”‚
                                      โ”‚ โ€ข BLOCK_MERGE_CRITICAL (Score >= 70)     โ”‚
                                      โ”‚ โ€ข CHANGES_REQUESTED    (Score >= 40)     โ”‚
                                      โ”‚ โ€ข APPROVED_WITH_ADVISORIES               โ”‚
                                      โ”‚ โ€ข CLEAN_APPROVAL                         โ”‚
                                      โ””โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”ฌโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”˜
                                                           โ”‚
                              โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”ผโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”
                              โ–ผ                            โ–ผ                            โ–ผ
                    โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”         โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”         โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”
                    โ”‚ Committable Fix  โ”‚         โ”‚  GitHub / GitLab โ”‚         โ”‚  OASIS SARIF     โ”‚
                    โ”‚ ```suggestion    โ”‚         โ”‚  Markdown Review โ”‚         โ”‚  v2.1.0 JSON     โ”‚
                    โ””โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”˜         โ””โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”˜         โ””โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”˜

Gate 1: Secret & Credential Leak Detection

  • AWS Access Keys: Identifies AKIA[0-9A-Z]{16} and suggests process.env.AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID.

  • Stripe Live Keys: Intercepts sk_live_[0-9a-zA-Z]{24,} and rk_live_....

  • Supabase Service Role JWTs: Intercepts high-privilege service-role tokens that bypass RLS.

  • AI Model Keys: Catches OpenAI (sk-..., sk-proj-...) and Anthropic Claude (sk-ant-api...).

  • GitHub PATs: Detects classic ghp_... and fine-grained github_pat_... tokens.

  • Slack Incoming Webhooks: Identifies private team channel webhooks.

  • Private Cryptographic Keys: Detects committed -----BEGIN RSA/EC PRIVATE KEY-----.

  • High-Entropy Secrets: Analyzes Shannon entropy ($\ge 3.0$) on sensitive key assignments (api_key, secret, password).

Gate 2: OWASP Top 10 & Injection Vulnerability Scanner

  • SQL Injection (CWE-89 / OWASP A03): Catches unparameterized string concatenation and template literal variable interpolations in query executions (query("SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = '" + id + "'")). Generates parameterized $1, $2 replacement diffs.

  • Dynamic Code Execution (CWE-95): Flags eval(), new Function(), and timer string concatenation.

  • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS / CWE-79): Intercepts dangerouslySetInnerHTML lacking DOMPurify.sanitize(...).

  • Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF / CWE-918): Flags outbound fetch(req.query.url) and axios calls dispatched without hostname allowlist verification.

  • Path Traversal (CWE-22 / OWASP A01): Catches unsanitized file system reads (fs.readFileSync(path.join('/tmp', req.query.file))).

  • Insecure Cookies (CWE-614 / OWASP A05): Flags res.cookie() invocations missing httpOnly: true or secure: true.

Gate 3: WCAG 2.2 AA & EU EAA UI Diff Gate

  • Image Accessibility (WCAG 1.1.1 / EU EAA EN 301 549): Scans added JSX/TSX/Vue/HTML lines for <img> and <Image> tags lacking an alt attribute.

  • Button Name & Type (WCAG 4.1.2): Flags <button> elements missing explicit type="button"|"submit" or missing accessible screen-reader labels (aria-label).

  • Focus Indicator Suppression (WCAG 2.4.7): Detects outline-none or focus:outline-none used without visible focus rings (focus-visible:ring-2).

  • Non-Interactive Click Handlers (WCAG 2.1.1): Catches onClick listeners placed on <div> or <span> without role="button", tabIndex, or keyboard handlers.

  • Touch Target Size (WCAG 2.2 SC 2.5.8): Flags undersized buttons (<44x44px) lacking required touch padding.

Gate 4: EU AI Act Art. 50 & Database RLS Diff Gate

  • EU AI Act Article 50 (Transparency Obligations): Flags new AI/LLM conversational UI components (<AiAssistant>, <ChatBot>, useChat) that do not disclose to natural persons that they are interacting with an AI system (aria-label="AI-generated response" data-ai-generated="true").

  • PostgreSQL / Supabase Row Level Security (RLS): Flags added CREATE TABLE DDL migration statements lacking corresponding ALTER TABLE <name> ENABLE ROW LEVEL SECURITY;.


๐Ÿ› ๏ธ MCP Tools Reference (Stdio JSON-RPC 2.0)

When configured inside Claude Desktop, Cursor, or Windsurf, the reviewer exposes 4 Native MCP Tools:

MCP Tool Name

Description

Key Parameters

review_git_diff

Full 4-gate audit returning prRiskScore (0-100), mergeDecision, categorized findings, and a formatted PR review comment.

diff (string, required), failOnSeverity (CRITICAL, HIGH, MEDIUM)

scan_diff_for_secrets

Fast credential leak scan returning detected keys and exact .env replacement diffs.

diff (string, required)

generate_github_pr_suggestions

Generates committable GitHub/GitLab ```suggestion blocks mapped to target files and exact new-file line numbers.

diff (string, required)

export_pr_sarif_report

Generates standard OASIS SARIF v2.1.0 JSON format for GitHub Advanced Security and CI/CD code scanning dashboards.

diff (string, required), toolName (string, optional)


โš™๏ธ Quickstart & Installation

1. Claude Desktop Configuration

Add to your claude_desktop_config.json:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "pr-security-reviewer": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["-y", "mcp-github-gitlab-pr-security-and-compliance-reviewer"]
    }
  }
}

2. Cursor IDE Configuration

In Cursor Settings > Features > MCP, click Add New MCP Server:

  • Name: pr-security-reviewer

  • Type: command

  • Command: npx -y mcp-github-gitlab-pr-security-and-compliance-reviewer

3. CLI Usage

Run directly from terminal or in git hooks:

# Audit active unstaged or staged git diff
git diff | npx mcp-pr-reviewer --fail-on CRITICAL

# Audit PR diff between feature branch and main
git diff origin/main...HEAD | npx mcp-pr-reviewer --format markdown

# Audit a saved .patch file and export SARIF report
npx mcp-pr-reviewer --file ./pr.patch --format sarif --output ./pr-security.sarif.json

# Test with built-in enterprise PR scenario
npx mcp-pr-reviewer --preset 1 --format markdown

# Launch/build interactive Dark UI Studio
npx mcp-pr-reviewer --studio

๐Ÿค– GitHub Actions CI/CD Integration

Block insecure pull requests automatically in your repository:

# .github/workflows/pr-security-gate.yml
name: PR DevSecOps & Compliance Gate

on:
  pull_request:
    types: [opened, synchronize, reopened]

jobs:
  security-audit:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    permissions:
      contents: read
      pull-requests: write
      security-events: write

    steps:
      - name: Checkout Code
        uses: actions/checkout@v4
        with:
          fetch-depth: 0

      - name: Setup Node.js
        uses: actions/setup-node@v4
        with:
          node-version: 20

      - name: Generate PR Unified Diff
        run: git diff ${{ github.event.pull_request.base.sha }} ${{ github.event.pull_request.head.sha }} > pr.diff

      - name: Run MCP PR Reviewer Audit
        run: |
          npx mcp-github-gitlab-pr-security-and-compliance-reviewer \
            --file pr.diff \
            --format sarif \
            --output pr-audit.sarif.json \
            --fail-on CRITICAL

      - name: Upload SARIF to GitHub Code Scanning
        if: always()
        uses: github/codeql-action/upload-sarif@v3
        with:
          sarif_file: pr-audit.sarif.json

๐ŸŽจ Interactive Studio (dist/mcp-pr-security-studio.html)

The package includes an Interactive Dark UI PR Diff Security & Compliance Studio adhering to strict Frontend Craftsmanship standards:

  • Zero generic AI tropes: Clean #090D14 canvas, #111827 surface, 1px #1E293B borders, and high-contrast semantic tokens (Emerald #10B981, Rose #F43F5E, Amber #F59E0B, Sky #0EA5E9).

  • 4 Built-In Enterprise Scenarios: Switch between critical leaks, AI Act transparency issues, Express SSRF risks, and 100% clean production PRs with one click.

  • In-Browser Diff Auditing: Paste any custom git diff and audit it instantly in-browser.

  • One-Click Exports: Copy committable GitHub suggestions, full PR review comments, or download standard SARIF v2.1.0 reports.

To open the studio:

npm run demo
# Open dist/mcp-pr-security-studio.html in your browser

๐Ÿงช Comprehensive Verification Suite

Product 62 is backed by 45 automated tests covering line number tracking, all 4 gates, committable suggestions, SARIF schema compliance, MCP JSON-RPC protocol, and CLI execution:

npm test -- --run
 โœ“ tests/pr-diff-engine.test.js (45)
   โœ“ Unified Git Diff Parsing & Hunk Extraction (6)
   โœ“ Gate 1: Secret & Credential Leak Detection (9)
   โœ“ Gate 2: OWASP Top 10 & Injection Vulnerability Scanner (8)
   โœ“ Gate 3: WCAG 2.2 AA & EU EAA UI Diff Gate (5)
   โœ“ Gate 4: EU AI Act Art. 50 & Database RLS Diff Gate (4)
   โœ“ Risk Scoring, Merge Decisions & Suggestion Formatting (5)
   โœ“ SARIF v2.1.0 Export (2)
   โœ“ MCP Server & Tool Handlers (5)
   โœ“ Interactive Studio HTML Generation (1)

 Test Files  1 passed (1)
      Tests  45 passed (45)

๐Ÿ“„ License & Commercial Support

Licensed under the MIT License.
Part of the Prong 2 Commercial Marketplace Suite. Available for standalone enterprise licensing, custom gate rule authoring, and private MCP deployment on Smithery.ai and Glama.ai.

Available Tools

4 tools
export_pr_sarif_reportB

Converts git diff audit results into standard OASIS SARIF v2.1.0 format for native integration into GitHub Advanced Security, GitLab Code Quality, and CI/CD security dashboards.

Inputs: diff (required), toolName.

generate_github_pr_suggestionsB

Generates committable GitHub/GitLab inline review suggestions (```suggestion blocks) mapped to exact target files and new-file line numbers for all security, injection, WCAG, and AI Act compliance findings.

Inputs: diff (required).

review_git_diffA

Performs a full multi-gate DevSecOps and compliance audit of a unified git diff (.patch / git diff / PR payload). Returns prRiskScore (0-100), mergeDecision (BLOCK_MERGE_CRITICAL, CHANGES_REQUESTED, APPROVED_WITH_ADVISORIES, CLEAN_APPROVAL), categorized findings, and a formatted GitHub review comment.

Inputs: diff (required), failOnSeverity.

scan_diff_for_secretsB

Scans added git diff lines for hardcoded credentials (AWS, Stripe, Supabase JWT, OpenAI, Anthropic, GitHub PAT, Slack webhooks, PEM keys, high-entropy secrets) and returns exact .env replacement diffs.

Inputs: diff (required).

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Loading tool schema changelogโ€ฆ

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The tools target mostly distinct outputs: secret scanning with .env replacements, full diff audit, inline review suggestions, and SARIF export. There is minor potential overlap because review_git_diff performs a broad security audit that may include secret-related findings, but the specialized replacement-diff behavior of scan_diff_for_secrets helps distinguish it.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names use snake_case and begin with a clear action verb: scan, review, generate, export. The object/context phrasing varies slightly but remains predictable and readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Four tools are well-scoped for a focused PR security and compliance review workflow. Each tool has a distinct role in the pipeline: detect secrets, audit the diff, generate suggestions, and export findings.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the core review flow from diff input through secret detection, audit, remediation suggestions, and SARIF export. Minor gaps remain around directly fetching PRs/diffs or posting review comments back to GitHub/GitLab, but these may be outside the intended diff-processing scope.

    Maintenance

    ActivityNo data
    ResponsivenessOutdated data

    Related MCP Connectors

    Related MCP Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI-powered, zero-trust code review with multiple models, supporting single files, git diffs, and multiple files, with security, performance, and architecture checks across 10+ languages.
      15
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables local security scanning and compliance gap analysis for code and text, detecting secrets, PII, and OWASP vulnerabilities, and assessing readiness across major frameworks like NCA, ISO 27001, NIST CSF, and SOC 2.
      -
    • A
      license
      D
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform security audits on pull request diffs by detecting secrets, dangerous code patterns, and new dependencies, outputting structured JSON for generating PR review comments.
      1
      MIT