ns-bridge
Related Servers
Alternatives to ns-bridge
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for querying Belgian railway data (SNCB/NMBS) via the iRail API, enabling station search, liveboard, and journey planning.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for querying Dutch railway data via the NS API, with planned tools for station search, departures, trip planning, and disruptions.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server for real-time Italian railway data, enabling natural language queries about train schedules, delays, departures, arrivals, and live tracking via the Viaggiatreno API.6MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that exposes the Deutsche Bahn public transport API to any MCP-compatible client (Claude Desktop, Cursor, Cline, Continue, etc.). Five tools cover station search, departures, journey planning, trip details, and nearby stations.6MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server for Swiss Federal Railways (SBB) open data, enabling AI models to query real-time disruptions, passenger frequencies, station details, and more without an API key.1022 PyPI2MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceAn (unofficial) MCP server for the Deutsche Bahn Timetables API — station search, planned departures, and real-time changes (delays, platform changes, cancellations) as tools for Claude and other MCP clients.42MIT
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no overlap: get_departures retrieves departure board information for a single station, search_stations finds station codes, and search_trips plans routes between stations. The descriptions clearly differentiate their functions, making misselection unlikely.
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with snake_case naming: get_departures, search_stations, and search_trips. The verbs 'get' and 'search' are appropriately chosen for their respective operations, creating a predictable and readable naming convention throughout.
With only 3 tools, the server feels somewhat thin for a train travel domain. While the tools cover core functionalities (departure info, station search, trip planning), additional operations like booking tickets, checking disruptions, or managing favorites would enhance coverage. The count is borderline minimal but functional.
The tool surface covers essential train travel workflows: finding stations, checking departures, and planning trips with pricing. Minor gaps exist, such as no ticket booking, real-time disruption alerts, or saved trip management, but agents can work effectively with the provided tools for basic planning and information retrieval.