project-memory-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to project-memory-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI coding agents to persist and retrieve project-scoped memories across sessions using local SQLite FTS5 keyword search.1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceProvides AI coding assistants with persistent memory storage using a local SQLite database. Enables tools to remember project details, notes, and relationships across sessions to maintain context and reduce repetitive explanations.174MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides AI coding assistants with persistent project memory to retain architectural decisions, code patterns, and domain knowledge across sessions. It stores data locally in a SQLite database, allowing agents to remember, recall, and manage project-specific context using full-text search.7 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to track, search, and retrieve their progress across projects with persistent memory using SQLite storage and LLM-powered summarization. Supports logging completed work, searching previous entries, and retrieving context for multi-step or multi-agent workflows.6 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to store, search, and manage persistent memories, todos, kanban boards, reminders, and progress trackers in a local SQLite database.1Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceProvides persistent cross-session memory and full-text search for AI coding assistants, storing project context, decisions, and preferences while enabling searchable access to conversation history via local SQLite.81MIT
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: recording, searching, and summarizing project memory. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.
Names follow a predictable resource-prefixed pattern: memory_record, memory_search, project_status. The pattern is readable and consistent enough, though project_status is more of a noun phrase than an action-oriented name.
Three tools is well-scoped for a focused project-memory server. Each tool earns its place and the surface is small but not underwhelming.
Core memory workflows are covered: recording, searching, and checking status. A minor gap is the lack of a get-by-id or full-text retrieval tool, since search only returns excerpts; deletion is handled indirectly via supersede.