Skip to main content
Glama
extrei
by extrei

Related Servers

Alternatives to project-memory-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides AI coding assistants with persistent memory storage using a local SQLite database. Enables tools to remember project details, notes, and relationships across sessions to maintain context and reduce repetitive explanations.
      17
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides AI coding assistants with persistent project memory to retain architectural decisions, code patterns, and domain knowledge across sessions. It stores data locally in a SQLite database, allowing agents to remember, recall, and manage project-specific context using full-text search.
      7 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to track, search, and retrieve their progress across projects with persistent memory using SQLite storage and LLM-powered summarization. Supports logging completed work, searching previous entries, and retrieving context for multi-step or multi-agent workflows.
      6 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to store, search, and manage persistent memories, todos, kanban boards, reminders, and progress trackers in a local SQLite database.
      1
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides persistent cross-session memory and full-text search for AI coding assistants, storing project context, decisions, and preferences while enabling searchable access to conversation history via local SQLite.
      8
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: recording, searching, and summarizing project memory. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Names follow a predictable resource-prefixed pattern: memory_record, memory_search, project_status. The pattern is readable and consistent enough, though project_status is more of a noun phrase than an action-oriented name.

    Tool Count5/5

    Three tools is well-scoped for a focused project-memory server. Each tool earns its place and the surface is small but not underwhelming.

    Completeness4/5

    Core memory workflows are covered: recording, searching, and checking status. A minor gap is the lack of a get-by-id or full-text retrieval tool, since search only returns excerpts; deletion is handled indirectly via supersede.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues