Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to tcs-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that integrates Claude with the Kyushu University supercomputer Genkai's TCS (PJM) job scheduler. It enables natural language control of job submission, status monitoring, deletion, resource queries, and reading output files.
      11
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for the Fugaku supercomputer that enables natural language job submission, monitoring, file transfer, and command execution via AI agents like Claude Code.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that converts SSH operations on training servers into AI-callable tools for GPU monitoring, job submission, file transfer, and more.
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables LLMs to execute Python code on GPU-accelerated compute nodes within SLURM-managed HPC environments. It bridges local clients to remote clusters by launching JupyterLab sessions via SLURM jobs to facilitate high-performance notebook-based computation.
      7
      -

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 18 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes (jobs, files, resources, modules, etc.). However, validate_job and render_job both handle structured job definitions, creating minor ambiguity about which to use for validation only. submit_job also performs a preview, but its confirmation token makes its role clear.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The vast majority of tools follow a clear verb_noun pattern (list_jobs, get_job, submit_job, read_file, etc.). The only outlier is 'system_status', which uses noun_noun instead of a verb-based name, breaking the otherwise consistent convention.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 18 tools, the set is slightly above the ideal 3-15 range, but the breadth of functionality (job management, file operations, system status, and the preview/confirm flow) justifies the count. It is not bloated to the point of being overwhelming.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the core HPC workflow: job submission/validation/cancellation/statistics, file reading/writing/searching/transfer, resource and module queries, and system status. Minor gaps exist, such as no direct job output/error viewing (though read_file can access output paths) and no job modification (update/alter), but these are workable.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues