garageband_launch

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations present, so the description carries full burden. It only says 'Launch and bring forward' but does not disclose behavior such as whether it always launches fresh or just brings to front if already running, or any error conditions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, no fluff. Every word is necessary and the description is front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple action tool with no parameters or output schema, the description is mostly complete. However, minor gaps exist regarding whether it always launches fresh or handles an already-running instance.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

No parameters exist, and schema coverage is 100%. Baseline is 3 per rubric because the description adds no parameter information, which is appropriate given no params.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Launch' and resource 'GarageBand', with effect 'bring it forward'. It is clear, but there is no differentiation from sibling tool 'garageband_open' which may have a similar purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'garageband_open' or 'garageband_status'. The description only states what it does without context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.