Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to assay-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP tools to be gated behind per-call USDC micropayments with direct on-chain verification and settlement, removing the need for third-party payment facilitators.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to access 11 paid x402 endpoints as standard MCP tools, paying per call in USDC on Base without API keys, covering chat, code, vision, embeddings, crypto prices, weather, geolocation, forex, and WHOIS data.
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Exposes 25 paid API endpoints as MCP tools for AI agents, with payments in USDC on Base mainnet via the x402 protocol, enabling tasks like web search, company intelligence, and crypto research.
      25
      47 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Exposes Base mainnet chain query tools over MCP, letting clients fetch an address's native balance and current gas fee estimates (slow/standard/fast urgency) from an upstream HTTP API. Paid tools are gated by x402 micropayments settled through the CDP facilitator, with a free health check and a documented free-trial allotment.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides access to 70 paid APIs as MCP tools with per-call and session budgets, paying via x402/USDC on Base without requiring an account or login. Includes a built-in allowlist of hosts and safe defaults to prevent unintended payments.
      14
      31 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: querying Base pools, verifying claims against pasted passages, and checking account/status information. There is no overlap or realistic chance of selecting the wrong tool.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    All names use lowercase snake_case, but the pattern is mixed: verify_claim is verb_noun, new_base_pools is modifier_noun, and assay_status is noun_noun. The names are still readable and predictable, but they do not follow a single consistent convention.

    Tool Count5/5

    Three tools is appropriate for this focused paid-data server: one data query, one verification action, and one status/account tool. Each tool earns its place and the count is not excessive or thin for the stated functionality.

    Completeness3/5

    The core interactions are covered, but new_base_pools returns only a condensed page plus a path to the full paid answer, and no tool exists to retrieve that full answer. There is also no way to fetch past results or revisit prior purchases from within the server, leaving a notable workflow gap.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues