Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to eip-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to search and analyze vulnerabilities and exploits from multiple intelligence sources, including NVD, CISA KEV, ExploitDB, Metasploit, and more, with tools for CVE research, exploit analysis, and report generation.
      17
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Integrates the Exploit-DB database with AI assistants to enable searching for exploits, shellcodes, and proof-of-concept code during penetration testing workflows. It allows users to perform keyword searches and direct CVE-to-exploit mappings to retrieve technical security data.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to search, correlate, and monitor real-time vulnerability intelligence from NVD, CISA KEV, EPSS, and MITRE ATT&CK, including CVE details, critical CVE tracking, known exploited vulnerabilities, and exploitation probability scores.
      5
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to access realtime CVE intelligence aggregated from NVD, CISA KEV, EPSS, GitHub advisories, PoC discovery, and Metasploit/Nuclei tooling, providing vulnerability details, exploitation signals, and prioritized triage verdicts.
      12
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides CVE lookup, search, and exploit intelligence from public vulnerability sources (NVD, CISA KEV, EPSS) for AI agents to produce remediation guidance without consuming LLM tokens for data fetching.
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 17 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tool purposes are mostly distinct, with slight overlap between search_exploits and search_vulnerabilities, but descriptions clarify the difference. Each tool targets a specific aspect of exploit intelligence, reducing ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (e.g., get_vulnerability, search_exploits, list_authors). No mixing of conventions occurs.

    Tool Count4/5

    17 tools is slightly above the ideal range but still reasonable for a comprehensive exploit intelligence platform. Each tool serves a distinct function without being excessive.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers major intelligence operations: search, retrieve, analyze, format, and list. Missing update/delete is expected for a read-only platform. Minor gaps like direct comparison tools are workable.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues