Szczegóły ogłoszenia OLX

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so the description carries the full burden. It does useful work by enumerating what comes back (description, all photos, params, seller), implicitly signaling a read-only single-record fetch, but it says nothing about failure behavior for a missing/expired id, permissions, or rate limits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single front-loaded sentence covering purpose, parameter source, and return contents with no filler. The parenthetical is well placed rather than tacked on at the end.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a one-parameter tool with no output schema, the description covers what the agent needs to call it and what to expect back. Minor gaps remain around error cases and whether photo/param fields are always present.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0% and the schema only constrains id to a positive integer with no description, so the description fully compensates: it specifies 'numeric id' and traces the value's provenance to the 'id' field returned by search_offers.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Full details of one offer') and pins it to a single numeric id, which cleanly separates it from the list-oriented search_offers sibling. An agent can tell immediately that this is the single-record fetch, not a search.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly tells the agent the 'id' value comes from search_offers, which is the key usage precondition and establishes the search-then-fetch workflow. It does not address the resolve_olx_url sibling (when to start from a URL instead), so no true when-not guidance is present.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.