Skip to main content
Glama
expel-io

Atlassian Goals MCP Server

by expel-io
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to Atlassian Goals MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • MCP Atlassian

      uchinx
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Model Context Protocol server that integrates with Atlassian Confluence and Jira, enabling AI assistants to search, create, and update content in these platforms through natural language interactions.
      1
      MIT

    • Jira MCP Server

      sthirugn
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A clean and focused Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that provides seamless integration between AI assistants and Jira, enabling natural language interaction with your Jira projects, issues, and workflows.
      5
      MIT

    • @abdelrahmanhsn/jira-mcp

      abdelrahman-hsn
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that connects your AI IDE to Jira. Query your tickets, active sprint, and issue details directly from GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Claude Desktop, or any MCP-compatible client.
      16 npm
      ISC
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 15 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: list versus search for retrieval, batch versus single get, update versus post/edit for modifications, and add/remove for tags. The only potential overlap is between list_goals and search_goals, but their descriptions clarify the use cases.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tool names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern, with plural forms for batch operations (get_goals vs get_goal). There is minor inconsistency with update_goal versus edit_goal_update, but the pattern remains predictable overall.

    Tool Count5/5

    15 tools is at the upper end of the ideal range and each tool has a clear role. The count is well-scoped for managing goals and projects, with no unnecessary tools.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool set lacks create_goal and delete_goal, which are core lifecycle operations. While it covers reading, searching, updating, and posting updates, the inability to create or delete goals is a significant gap that will block common workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessSyncing

    Resources