get-upcoming
Retrieve upcoming tasks from the Things app to view scheduled to-dos.
Instructions
Get upcoming todos
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Retrieve upcoming tasks from the Things app to view scheduled to-dos.
Get upcoming todos
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description must disclose behavioral traits. It only says 'Get upcoming todos' without stating read-only nature, return format, or any constraints, leaving significant gaps.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely concise at 4 words, but may be too brief to inform. However, it is front-loaded and efficient.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the simple structure (no params, no output schema), the description is minimal. It does not explain what 'upcoming' means or how results differ from siblings, so completeness is low.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist, so baseline is 4. Description adds nothing beyond schema, but that is acceptable given zero parameters.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description states 'Get upcoming todos', which is a specific verb and resource, but does not clarify what 'upcoming' means compared to sibling tools like 'get-today' or 'get-anytime'. The purpose is clear only at a high level, lacking differentiation.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. With 20+ sibling tools, the description should indicate context or scope, but it does not.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/excelsier/things-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server