A
licenseB
qualityA
maintenanceMCP server for Veo 3.1 video generation models, enabling task creation (extend, text-to-video, upscale), status polling, and pricing checks via RunAPI.
6
71 npm
1
Apache 2.0
Google Veo 3.1 MCP Server
by ex-takashima
Related Servers
Alternatives to Google Veo 3.1 MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that exposes Google's Veo2 video generation capabilities, allowing clients to generate videos from text prompts or images.734MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for 4K video generation using Google VEO 3.1 — text-to-video, image-to-video, video extension, and frame interpolation.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for generating images and videos using Google Gemini and VEO models, with support for multiple AI models and credential modes.1Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for generating, editing, and batch processing videos using xAI's Grok Imagine Video API, with support for text-to-video, image-to-video, and video editing via natural language prompts.445 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceOne MCP server for music, image, video, and audio generation across Suno, Grok Imagine, Seedance, Kling, Hailuo, Wan, VEO, Ideogram, and GPT Image 2. Generate, edit, upscale, reframe, and master through one API key and one credit pool.1692 npm6MIT
TDQS
A4.2/5.0
Scored across 4 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool targets a distinct video operation: generating from text/image, extending an existing video, interpolating between keyframes, and checking status. The descriptions clearly differentiate inputs and purposes, leaving no ambiguity for an agent.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern: generate_video, extend_video, interpolate_frames, get_video_status. The pattern is predictable and mixes well with the domain.
Tool Count5/5
The server has exactly four tools, which is well-scoped for a video generation service. It covers the core generation capabilities plus status checking without unnecessary clutter.
Completeness4/5
The tool surface covers generation, extension, interpolation, and status retrieval, which are the primary workflows. A minor gap is the lack of a cancel or list operations, but agents can work around this with the existing status tool.
Maintenance
ActivityStale
ResponsivenessNo issues