rba_restart_roblox

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the transparency burden and does a good job by disclosing the exact steps: discovering/verifying the executable path, closing 'only RobloxPlayerBeta processes', and launching normally. This explicitly communicates safety-focused behavior, though edge cases like process-not-found or launch failure are not addressed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, well-structured sentence that front-loads the core action and then provides a concise step-by-step summary. Every word carries meaning with no filler, making it easy to parse quickly.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description gives a solid high-level overview of the restart process, but lacks details on parameter semantics (e.g., what restartDelayMs controls) and potential failure modes. Since there is no output schema, the description also does not clarify what the return value indicates, leaving some gaps in completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema covers only 33% of parameters (only closeAll has a description), and the tool description provides no additional parameter details. Para meters like restartDelayMs and waitForProcessMs are entirely underexplained, so the description fails to compensate for the schema's low coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with 'Safely restart RobloxPlayerBeta.exe', a specific verb+resource pairing that immediately conveys the tool's purpose. It also details the multi-step process (discover/verify path, close processes, launch), which distinguishes it from sibling tools focused on other aspects like crash detection or screenshots.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage when a restart of Roblox is needed, but provides no explicit 'when to use' versus alternatives or exclusion criteria. The emphasis on 'Safely' hints that this is the recommended method, but no direct comparison to manual restart or other sibling tools is made.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.