Skip to main content
Glama
evergreen-ci

evergreen-mcp-server

Official
by evergreen-ci

Related Servers

Alternatives to evergreen-mcp-server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Feature-rich MCP server for MongoDB with multi-connection support, enabling users to interact with multiple MongoDB clusters simultaneously, perform CRUD operations, run aggregations, diagnostics, and more, all through natural language.
      5 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enterprise-grade MCP server for Jenkins CI/CD integration that enables AI assistants to diagnose build failures, analyze pipelines, and search logs through natural conversation.
      6
      GPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables large language models to interact directly with MongoDB databases, allowing them to query collections, inspect schemas, and manage data through natural language.
      19 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for MongoDB operations, enabling AI assistants to interact with MongoDB databases through a standardized interface.
      19 npm
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A production-ready MCP server for MongoDB with AI-powered tools for exploration, querying, diagnostics, monitoring, data quality, and safe writes.
      26 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides Azure DevOps integration for AI assistants, enabling them to list projects, run pipelines, analyze failures, view logs, and troubleshoot builds directly from chat interfaces.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes, but the summary/detailed pairs (get_task_log/get_test_results) could cause initial confusion. However, descriptions clearly contrast them, reducing ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Naming patterns are inconsistent: some tools end with '_evergreen', others don't; verbs vary (download, get, list); 'detailed' and 'summary' are used as suffixes but not consistently across all tools.

    Tool Count5/5

    8 tools is a reasonable count for a CI/CD debugging server, covering artifact downloads, log retrieval, test results, and patch listing without being excessive.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set provides comprehensive retrieval capabilities for debugging failures: from listing patches and failed jobs to detailed logs and test results. No obvious gaps for the intended use case.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues