Skip to main content
Glama
evascrape

Evascrape MCP server

Official
by evascrape

Related Servers

Alternatives to Evascrape MCP server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Lead generation MCP server for AI agents. Find emails, verify contacts, enrich profiles, and search prospects using Hunter.io, Apollo.io, and Abstract API.
      8
      13 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      B2B lead generation MCP server with 20+ lead generation tools - Apollo scraping, Google Maps, email finder, email validator, mobile finder, skip trace, ecommerce store data, and more.
      25
      466 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables finding B2B leads with verified work emails, finding and verifying email addresses, and running cold email outreach from any MCP client.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to search B2B people and companies, enrich contacts with verified emails and mobile phone numbers via waterfall enrichment across 25+ providers, and export results as CSV or JSON. Supports prospecting, org mapping, candidate sourcing, and outreach workflows through OAuth-authenticated remote access from any MCP-compatible client.
      9
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The three lead tools clearly target different sources (Google Maps scraping, Apollo URL export, LinkedIn filter-based search), and the support tools (check_balance, job_status, estimate_cost, download) each have a distinct role. No two tools can be reasonably confused for the same task.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names use snake_case consistently, but the convention varies slightly: source-oriented nouns (google_maps_leads, linkedin_leads, apollo_export) mix with verb-oriented names (check_balance, estimate_cost, download, job_status). Still predictable and readable throughout.

    Tool Count5/5

    Seven tools is well-scoped for a scraping service: three job-starting sources plus four support operations (balance, status, cost, download). Every tool earns its place with no redundancy.

    Completeness4/5

    The job lifecycle (start -> poll -> download), cost estimation, and balance checks are all covered, matching the async job model. Minor gaps like listing/cancelling existing jobs or a job history tool exist but agents can work around them.

    Maintenance

    ActivityNo data
    ResponsivenessNo issues