Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
arxiv-mcp

arxiv-mcp

by evangit2
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Search Papers

search_papers

Find arXiv papers by keyword, author, category, or ID without an API key, with sorting and configurable result limits.

Instructions

Search arXiv papers. No API key needed.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "query": "<query>"
    },
    "name": "search_papers"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
queryYeskeywords, e.g. "quantum error correction". For author/category/ID searches use search_field instead.
sort_byNo"relevance", "lastUpdatedDate" or "submittedDate".relevance
sort_orderNo"ascending" or "descending".descending
max_resultsNo1-50 papers to return.
search_fieldNo"all" | "title" | "author" | "abstract" | "category" | "id". "category" expects e.g. "cs.AI"; "id" expects an arXiv ID.all

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

B3.2/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are supplied, so the description carries the full disclosure burden. "No API key needed" is a genuine behavioral fact that the schema does not convey, and searching is inherently a read operation, but the description says nothing about rate limits, result caps, or pagination behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences with no filler, and the core action is stated first. It is lean rather than padded, though the brevity leaves obvious gaps that more sentences would have earned.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return values need not be explained, and the 5-parameter schema is fully documented. What is missing for a 5-parameter search tool is any statement of scope or how it relates to the retrieval siblings, leaving the agent to infer selection.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%: query, sort_by, sort_order, max_results, and search_field all have documented meaning, including enum-like values and the category/ID formats. The description adds nothing beyond that, so the baseline of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

"Search arXiv papers" gives a specific verb and resource, which is enough to identify the operation. However, it does not distinguish itself from siblings like get_paper or extract_paper, so an agent cannot tell from the description alone which tool to pick for a known ID lookup.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance, and no sibling is named as an alternative. The schema's search_field note about author/category/ID is the only routing hint, and it lives in the parameter description rather than in the tool description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools