Skip to main content
Glama
evanfoglia

Wikipedia MCP

by evanfoglia
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to Wikipedia MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • wikipedia-mcp

      LLLeoLi
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives LLMs access to Wikipedia, supporting search, article retrieval, summaries, sections, and related topics across multiple languages and language variants.
      22
      MIT

    • Wikipedia MCP Server

      Ravishka17
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides comprehensive Wikipedia access for AI assistants via MCP Streamable HTTP transport, enabling search, article retrieval, summaries, section analysis, link discovery, and multi-language support.
      2
      MIT

    • Ratatoskr-mcp

      edk4971
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that exposes a single tool to retrieve Wikipedia articles from local multistream dump files, offering fast offline access with redirect following and fuzzy matching.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 51 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Every tool has a clearly distinct purpose, and descriptions explicitly cross-reference neighboring tools to prevent confusion (e.g., summary vs. simple_summary vs. article_extract, links vs. backlinks vs. external_links, revisions vs. recent_changes vs. revision_diff). Even the large daily-feed and trust-signal clusters are cleanly separated by source and function.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tool names use consistent snake_case with no mixed casing or chaotic conventions, which keeps the set readable. However, there is no single predictable pattern like verb_noun; names range from standalone nouns (search, random, quote) to descriptive noun phrases (article_extract, citation_sources, most_linked), so consistency is strong but not perfectly uniform.

    Tool Count1/5

    With 51 tools, the server far exceeds the recommended 3–15 range and lands in the rubric's 50+ extreme-mismatch territory. Even though many tools are distinct, the sheer volume creates unnecessary cognitive load and maintenance surface for what is fundamentally a read-only content-access server.

    Completeness5/5

    For a read-only Wikipedia access server, the surface is exceptionally complete: it covers search, summaries, full text, section navigation, metadata, categories, link graphs, revisions, pageviews, media, daily feeds, quality/trust signals, citations, and editor activity. No obvious lifecycle gaps remain for the stated read-only scope.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources