Skip to main content
Glama
evanfoglia

Wikipedia MCP

by evanfoglia
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to Wikipedia MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • wikipedia-mcp

      LLLeoLi
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives LLMs access to Wikipedia, supporting search, article retrieval, summaries, sections, and related topics across multiple languages and language variants.
      22
      MIT

    • Wikipedia MCP Server

      Ravishka17
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides comprehensive Wikipedia access for AI assistants via MCP Streamable HTTP transport, enabling search, article retrieval, summaries, section analysis, link discovery, and multi-language support.
      2
      -

    • Ratatoskr-mcp

      edk4971
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that exposes a single tool to retrieve Wikipedia articles from local multistream dump files, offering fast offline access with redirect following and fuzzy matching.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 26 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Every tool targets a distinct resource and action, with descriptions that explicitly disambiguate overlapping pairs (e.g., summary vs article_extract, links, backlinks, external_links, media vs media_list). The daily content tools are each unique (featured_article, on_this_day, deaths_on_this_day, picture_of_the_day, news), so an agent can reliably select the right one.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools use a single snake_case convention, whether they are noun-phrase ecosystem (article_sections, category_members, external_links) or verb-like names (search, links, care, point). There is no mixing of camelCase, abbreviations, or inconsistent verb styles, so the names feel cohesive and predictable.

    Tool Count3/5

    With 26 tools, the surface is larger than the typical 3-15 range and crosses the '25+' threshold. However, Wikipedia is a broad domain, and each tool covers a distinct read-only aspect (search, taxonomy, media, statistical, feeds, geo, translations, edit history). The count is high but not bloated for the apparent scope.

    Completeness5/5

    The toolset covers the read-only Wikipedia domain tightly: search and discovery, overview and full text, navigation through categories, links, backlinks, external links, translations, geo, media, pageview stats, recent changes, revisions, and daily curated feeds. There are no obvious gaps that would cause an agent to hit a dead end when trying to perform a typical Wikipedia research or content-sourcing task.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources