A
licenseNot graded
qualityA
maintenanceAn MCP server that provides tools for deterministic EU AI Act risk classification and documentation generation, enabling human-in-the-loop AI system assessments inside Claude Code.
1
MIT
mcp-eu-ai-act
by eucomplyhub
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-eu-ai-act
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for EU AI Act compliance analysis — classify any AI system or workflow against Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, updated with AI Omnibus 2026.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for UK AI Bill 2026 compliance, implementing a 5-principles framework (Safety, Transparency, Fairness, Accountability, Contestability) to help audit and classify AI systems.73 PyPIMIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for EU AI Act compliance, providing risk classification of AI features and Article 50 transparency notices.21Apache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceUK AI regulation compliance MCP server enabling AI regulation tracking, risk classification, and impact assessment for AI systems deployed in the UK.37 PyPI-
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server providing structured intelligence about the EU AI Act, including risk classification, deadline tracking, obligations, penalties, and article lookups.1042 npm3MIT
TDQS
A4.1/5.0
Scored across 2 tools
Disambiguation5/5
The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one is a deep, LLM-powered classification focused on EU AI Act Annex III, while the other is a deterministic, multi-jurisdiction quick risk assessment. There is no overlap or ambiguity.
Naming Consistency5/5
Both tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using snake_case: classify_annex3 and quick_risk_class. The naming convention is uniform and predictable.
Tool Count4/5
With only 2 tools, the server is minimal but appropriately scoped for a specific domain (AI Act risk classification). Each tool serves a distinct role, so the count is reasonable, though slightly low for broader coverage.
Completeness3/5
The tools cover deep Annex III classification and quick multi-jurisdiction orientation, but lack other potentially useful operations such as retrieving detailed category information, updating classifications, or generating reports. This creates notable gaps for comprehensive workflows.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues